Trade Remedies in the Renewable Energy Sector: Normal Value and Double Remedies

被引:3
作者
Barthelemy, Christine [1 ]
Peat, Daniel [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Jesus Coll, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Gonville & Caius Coll, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
关键词
renewable energy; subsidies; dumping; double remedies; sampling; surrogate country;
D O I
10.1163/22119000-01603002
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Subsidies within the renewable energy (RE) sector are rife. Active government support is now advocated as a part of 'green industrial policy' to stimulate growth within the sector. While providing the positive externality of climate change mitigation, these policies leave certain government support measures vulnerable to countermeasures under WTO law. The same products are also often subject to simultaneous anti-dumping duties. This article aims to investigate the interaction between these trade remedies in the RE sector. It examines what lessons can be taken from recent reports of the WTO Panel and Appellate Body, and examines the 2012 US and 2013 EU investigations into the dumping of photovoltaic products from China. It concludes by reviewing outstanding issues for trade remedies in the RE sector; namely, the appropriate choice of surrogate third country and sampling technique, the accurate calculation of dumping and subsidy effects, and the burden of proof for double remedies.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 466
页数:31
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FED REG, V77, P63788
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ADP137
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ACC PEOPL REP CHIN D
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, WTDS257ABR
[5]  
Government of India Department of Commerce (India DOC), 2012, IN ANT INV IMP SOL C
[6]  
Huang Nuying, 2014, DIGITIMES 0319
[7]  
India DOC, 2014, ANT INV IMP SOL CELL
[8]  
*INT EN AG, 2014, WORLD EN OUTL 2014 F
[9]  
International Association of Deposit Insurers, 2013, ENH GUID EFF DEP INS, P12
[10]   A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy [J].
Jaffe, AB ;
Newell, RG ;
Stavins, RN .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (2-3) :164-174