A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF CASES OF ANAEROBIC EMPYEMA AND UPDATE OF BACTERIOLOGY

被引:75
作者
CIVEN, R
JOUSIMIESSOMER, H
MARINA, M
BORENSTEIN, L
SHAH, H
FINEGOLD, SM
机构
[1] VET ADM WADSWORTH MED CTR,LOS ANGELES,CA 90073
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH MED,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[3] KAISER PERMANENTE MED GRP,RICHMOND,CA
[4] NATL PUBL HLTH INST,HELSINKI,FINLAND
[5] NATL CTR INFECT & PARASIT DIS,SOFIA,BULGARIA
[6] UNIV LONDON,EASTMAN DENT INST,LONDON,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1093/clinids/20.Supplement_2.S224
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
We conducted a retrospective study to update the bacteriology of 46 cases of anaerobic empyema that were originally studied between 1976 and 1993 at the Wadsworth Anaerobic Bacteriology Clinical Research Laboratory (Los Angeles), Anaerobic bacteriologic studies were completed for all 46 pleural fluid specimens, and aerobic bacteriologic studies were completed for 41 of these specimens. Thirty-seven clinical charts were available for review, A total of 161 anaerobic isolates (3.5 per patient) representing 64 species or groups were recovered, The most common isolates were as follows: Fusobacterium nucleatum (19); Prevotella oris-buccae group (13, 9 of which were P. oris); Bacteroides fragilis group (11, 4 of which were B. fragilis); pigmented Prevotella species (17, 8 of which were in the Prevotella intermedia-nigrescens group); Peptostreptococcus species (17, 9 of which were Peptostreptococcus micros); Eubacterium species (7); Lactobacillus species (8); Actinomyces species (7); and Clostridium species (7). Nineteen of the cases were of purely anaerobic etiology; of these, eight were caused by a single organism: F. nucleatum (five cases); B. fragilis (two cases); and Prevotella magnus (one case), Of the 45 aerobic isolates (1,1 per patient), viridans streptococci were most common (21 isolates), followed by group D nonenterococcal streptococci (four isolates). Only nine gram-negative rods (six enteric and three nonenteric organisms) and one Staphylococcus aureus isolate were recovered, The susceptibility to penicillin of 64 isolates was examined with use of the spiral gradient method; 21 (33%) of these isolates were beta-lactamase positive (MICs ranged from 1.1 to greater than or equal to 54 mu g/mL vs. less than or equal to 0.27 mu g/mL for beta-lactamase-negative strains).
引用
收藏
页码:S224 / S229
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Bartlett J.G., Anaerobic bacterial infections of the lung and pleural space, Clin Infect Dis, 16, pp. S248-S255, (1993)
  • [2] Beerens H., Tahon-Castel M., Infections Humaines a Bacteries Anaerobies Non Toxigenes, pp. 91-114, (1965)
  • [3] Bartlett J.G., Gorbach S.L., Thadepalli H., Finegold S.M., Bacteriology of empyema, Lancet, 81, pp. 329-331, (1974)
  • [4] Bartlett J.G., Finegold S.M., Anaerobic infections of the lung and pleural space, Am Rev Respir Dis, 110, pp. 56-77, (1974)
  • [5] Sullivan K.M., O' Toole R.D., Fisher R.H., Sullivan K.N., Anaerobic empyema thoracis, Arch Intern Med, 131, pp. 521-527, (1973)
  • [6] Varkey B., Rose D., Kutty C., Politis J., Empyema thoracis during a ten-year period: Analysis of 72 cases and comparison to a previous study (1952 to 1967), Arch Intern Med, 141, pp. 1771-1776, (1981)
  • [7] Alfageme I., Munoz F., Pena N., Umbria S., Empyema of the thorax in adults, Chest, 103, pp. 839-843, (1993)
  • [8] Neild J.E., Eykyn S.J., Phillips I., Lung abscess and empyema, Q J Med, 224, pp. 875-882, (1985)
  • [9] Finegold S.M., Aspiration pneumonia, lung abscess and empyema, Respiratory Infections: Diagnosis and Management, pp. 191-199, (1983)
  • [10] Lemmer J., Botham M.J., Orringer M.B., Modern management of adult thoracic empyema, J Thorac Cardovasc Surg, 90, pp. 849-855, (1985)