Common Property and Power: Insights from a Spatial Analysis of Historical and Contemporary Pasture Boundaries among Pastoralists in Central Tibet

被引:10
作者
Bauer, Kenneth M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
participatory mapping; GIS; Central Tibet; common property resource management;
D O I
10.2458/v13i1.21676
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Spatial analysis can bring out crucial issues in the political ecology of pastoral areas, with important implications for planning future development. This research combines textual analysis, participatory mapping, ethnography, and remote sensing data to study resource use and common property among pastoralists in Central Tibet. Specifically, this paper presents a case study of pasture boundaries over time in the Porong region (Nyelam County, Shigatse Prefecture, Tibet Autonomous Region, PRC). Translation and analysis of an historical (1884) boundary survey from Porong yielded hundreds of toponyms, boundary markers, livestock corrals, and resource locations, which were catalogued and indexed in a geographical database. Toponyms and landscape features listed in the boundary survey were geo-referenced using a Geographic Positioning Systems (GPS) unit: fieldwork in Tibet resulted in the collection of over five hundred GPS points that marked historical and contemporary pasture boundaries. In addition, participatory maps of pastures were generated with local herders and subsequently digitized using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. These compiled GIS maps provide a time series of common property boundaries and illustrate how changes in Tibet's governance (feudalism vs. socialism) and type of economy (e.g., collectivized vs. private household production) did or did not impact the distribution of resources among pastoralists. Analysis of vegetation resources available within historical and contemporary common property units provides compelling evidence that boundaries reflect the balance of power relations, resulting in unequal availability of rangeland resources. The case study adds to the literature on common property by reinserting the state's central roles in defining boundaries, regulating resource use, and mediating resource conflicts.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 47
页数:24
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Abbot J., 1998, PLA Notes - International Institute for Environment and Development, P27
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, ANOTHER AM NATIVE AM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CULT PURE CRYSTAL MO
[4]  
Arce A., 2000, ANTHR DEV MODERNITIE, P1
[5]   OTHER KNOWLEDGE AND OTHER WAYS OF KNOWING [J].
BARTH, F .
JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 51 (01) :65-68
[6]  
BASSO K, 1996, WISDOM SITS PLACES
[7]  
Behnke R., 1994, Development Policy Review, V12, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7679.1994.tb00053.x
[8]  
Bennagen Ponciano L., 2000, MAPPING EARTH MAPPIN
[9]  
Boas F., 1934, GEOGRAPHICAL NAMES K
[10]  
Brown M., 2000, ARID LANDS NEWSLETTE, P48