CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION OF MICELLAR SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS

被引:31
|
作者
MARKELS, JH [1 ]
LYNN, S [1 ]
RADKE, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY, DEPT CHEM ENGN, BERKELEY, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/aic.690410906
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A steady-state fouling-resistance and osmotic-pressure model is used to predict flux in the laminar, cross-flow ultrafiltration of micellar cetyl (=hexadecyl)pyridinium chloride (CPC) solutions at 0.01-M NaCl background electrolyte. The model assumes a constant overall hydraulic resistance including the effect of surfactant fouling and native membrane resistance. Measurements of osmotic pressures of CPC solutions at 0.01-M NaCl as a function of surfactant concentration describe the effect of concentration polarization on permeate flux. Two types of asymmetric polyethersulfone membranes are used: 5,000 molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) membranes that allow partial monomer permeation, but quantitatively reject all micelles; 50,000 MWCO membranes that allow some micelle permeation. For the former the intrinsic rejection coefficient for monomer, measured separately, is sufficient to describe surfactant rejection, without adjustable parameters. Predictions of the volumetric flux of the permeate, including the value of the limiting flux, agree well with the experimental results over the entire range of pressure drop, axial velocity, and bulk surfactant concentration. For the 50,000 MWCO membranes the data are described using a best-fit value of the over all surfactant rejection coefficient. For the first time, unusual behavior is observed experimentally in which the flux levels off with increasing pressure drop across the membrane, only to increase sharply again at higher applied pressure drop. Both effects are in accord with the proposed model. No gel layer need be postulated to explain the flux behavior of either membrane type.
引用
收藏
页码:2058 / 2066
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-flow ultrafiltration of micellar solutions containing selected phenols
    Bielska, M
    Materna, K
    Szymanowski, J
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2003, 5 (04) : 454 - 459
  • [2] Dyes separation by means of cross-flow ultrafiltration of micellar solutions
    Bielska, Malgorzata
    Prochaska, Krystyna
    DYES AND PIGMENTS, 2007, 74 (02) : 410 - 415
  • [3] Ultrafiltration of Surfactant Micelles: Cross-flow Experiments and Flux Modelling
    Drews, Anja
    Arellano-Garcia, Harvey
    Schomaecker, Reinhard
    Kraume, Matthias
    Wozny, Guenter
    20TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2010, 28 : 787 - 792
  • [4] Critical flux in cross-flow ultrafiltration of protein solutions
    Metstämuronen, S
    Nyström, M
    DESALINATION, 2005, 175 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [5] STRUCTURAL-CHANGE AND MICELLAR COMPOSITION IN AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS OF BINARY CATIONIC SURFACTANT MIXTURES AS DEDUCED FROM CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION EXPERIMENTS
    MAKAYSSI, A
    LEMORDANT, D
    TREINER, C
    LANGMUIR, 1993, 9 (11) : 2808 - 2813
  • [6] SELECTIVE SEPARATION OF COPPER (II) AND COBALT (II) FROM WASTEWATER BY USING CONTINUOUS CROSS-FLOW MICELLAR-ENHANCED ULTRAFILTRATION AND SURFACTANT RECOVERY FROM METAL MICELLAR SOLUTIONS
    Anthati, Vijay Anand Kumar
    Marathe, K. V.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 89 (02): : 292 - 298
  • [7] SPRAY DRYING OF PROTEIN SOLUTIONS CONCENTRATED BY CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION
    MOHR, KH
    STEUBE, K
    KLEINSCHMIDT, T
    ACTA BIOTECHNOLOGICA, 1991, 11 (02): : 103 - 108
  • [8] Cross-flow micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for removal of nitrate and chromate: competitive binding
    Baek, K
    Yang, JW
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2004, 108 (1-2) : 119 - 123
  • [9] CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION SCALING CONSIDERATIONS
    Duignan, Mark R.
    Lee, Si Y.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER CONFERENCE, VOL 2, 2006, : 467 - 477
  • [10] CROSS-FLOW ULTRAFILTRATION OF HYDROCARBON EMULSIONS
    LOPEZ, RV
    ELMALEH, S
    GHAFFOUR, N
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1995, 102 : 55 - 64