CHEMORADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE FOR ANAL CANCER - A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON

被引:60
|
作者
ALLAL, A [1 ]
KURTZ, JM [1 ]
PIPARD, G [1 ]
MARTI, MC [1 ]
MIRALBELL, R [1 ]
POPOWSKI, Y [1 ]
EGELI, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV GENEVA,HOP CANTONAL,DEPT SURG,CH-1211 GENEVA 4,SWITZERLAND
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1993年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
ANAL CANCER; SPHINCTER PRESERVATION; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(93)90421-Q
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of adding one cycle of concomitant chemotherapy to curative radiotherapy on tumor control and toxicity in the treatment of anal cancer. Methods and Materials: One hundred twenty-five patients completed curative sphincter-conserving treatment, 57 with radiotherapy alone and 68 with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. Compared with chemoradiotherapy patients, radiotherapy patients were older (median age 71 vs 63) and had less advanced tumors (T3-4 26% vs 51%). Radiotherapy patients were usually treated with a direct perineal cobalt field (mean dose 31 Gy at 5 cm/10 fractions/3 weeks), complemented in most cases by a sacral arc field, followed (mean split 54 days) by Iridium-192 implantation (mean dose 23 Gy, Paris system). The large majority of chemoradiotherapy patients received antero-posterior opposed 10 MV photon fields, including pelvic and inguinial nodes (mean dose 38 Gy/19 fractions/4 weeks), followed (mean split 42 days) by implant boost (mean dose 18 Gy). In addition, chemo-radiotherapy patients received starting on day 1 an IV bolus of Mitomycin-C, 0.4 mg/kg (maximum 20 mg) and a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 600-800 mg/m2/day. Median follow-up was 65 months for radiotherapy and 48 months for chemo-radiotherapy patients. Results: For all 125 patients at 5 years, overall survival was 65.5%, definitive local control 83% and local control with sphincter preservation 68%. Overall and stage for stage, there was no difference in overall, progression-free or cancer-specific survival, nor in local control, local-regional control, or sphincter preservation rates between patients treated with chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding acute or late toxicity. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis does not confirm the efficacy of one course of simultaneous Mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil, at least in association with full-dose radiotherapy incorporating Iridium-192 boost.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Definitive chemoradiotherapy for a patient with anal cancer after renal transplantation
    Kashiwagi, Takeshi
    Sakanaka, Katsuyuki
    Inoo, Hiroyuki
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Fujii, Kota
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    INTERNATIONAL CANCER CONFERENCE JOURNAL, 2024, 13 (03) : 223 - 229
  • [32] Comparative study of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer
    Dhaka, Saroj
    Jakhar, Shankar Lal
    Sharma, Neeti
    Kumar, Harvinder Singh
    Kumar, Rajesh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (09) : S146 - S150
  • [33] Radiotherapy and radiochemotherapy for anal cancer
    Reinartz, G.
    Eich, H. T.
    ONKOLOGE, 2012, 18 (08): : 678 - +
  • [34] Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Future Directions
    Castaneda, Serguei A.
    Romak, Lindsay B.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 26 (03) : 467 - +
  • [35] A multicentre randomised clinical trial of chemoradiotherapy plus hyperthermia versus chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
    Harima, Yoko
    Ohguri, Takayuki
    Imada, Hajime
    Sakurai, Hideyuki
    Ohno, Tatsuya
    Hiraki, Yoshiyuki
    Tuji, Koh
    Tanaka, Masahiro
    Terashima, Hiromi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2016, 32 (07) : 801 - 808
  • [36] Effective treatment of anal cancer in the elderly with low-dose chemoradiotherapy
    Charnley, N
    Choudhury, A
    Chesser, P
    Cooper, RA
    Sebag-Montefiore, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (07) : 1221 - 1225
  • [37] Effective treatment of anal cancer in the elderly with low-dose chemoradiotherapy
    N Charnley
    A Choudhury
    P Chesser
    R A Cooper
    D Sebag-Montefiore
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 92 : 1221 - 1225
  • [38] Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dawe, David E.
    Christiansen, David
    Swaminath, Anand
    Ellis, Peter M.
    Rothney, Janet
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Mahmud, Salaheddin M.
    LUNG CANCER, 2016, 99 : 180 - 185
  • [39] Evolution of the Role of Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer
    Dee, Edward Christopher
    Byrne, James D.
    Wo, Jennifer Y.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (06) : 1 - 23
  • [40] Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of 2138 Patients
    Xu, Cheng
    Zhang, Li-He
    Chen, Yu-Pei
    Liu, Xu
    Zhou, Guan-Qun
    Lin, Ai-Hua
    Sun, Ying
    Ma, Jun
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 8 (02): : 287 - 297