CHEMORADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE FOR ANAL CANCER - A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON

被引:60
|
作者
ALLAL, A [1 ]
KURTZ, JM [1 ]
PIPARD, G [1 ]
MARTI, MC [1 ]
MIRALBELL, R [1 ]
POPOWSKI, Y [1 ]
EGELI, R [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV GENEVA,HOP CANTONAL,DEPT SURG,CH-1211 GENEVA 4,SWITZERLAND
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1993年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词
ANAL CANCER; SPHINCTER PRESERVATION; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(93)90421-Q
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of adding one cycle of concomitant chemotherapy to curative radiotherapy on tumor control and toxicity in the treatment of anal cancer. Methods and Materials: One hundred twenty-five patients completed curative sphincter-conserving treatment, 57 with radiotherapy alone and 68 with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. Compared with chemoradiotherapy patients, radiotherapy patients were older (median age 71 vs 63) and had less advanced tumors (T3-4 26% vs 51%). Radiotherapy patients were usually treated with a direct perineal cobalt field (mean dose 31 Gy at 5 cm/10 fractions/3 weeks), complemented in most cases by a sacral arc field, followed (mean split 54 days) by Iridium-192 implantation (mean dose 23 Gy, Paris system). The large majority of chemoradiotherapy patients received antero-posterior opposed 10 MV photon fields, including pelvic and inguinial nodes (mean dose 38 Gy/19 fractions/4 weeks), followed (mean split 42 days) by implant boost (mean dose 18 Gy). In addition, chemo-radiotherapy patients received starting on day 1 an IV bolus of Mitomycin-C, 0.4 mg/kg (maximum 20 mg) and a 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil 600-800 mg/m2/day. Median follow-up was 65 months for radiotherapy and 48 months for chemo-radiotherapy patients. Results: For all 125 patients at 5 years, overall survival was 65.5%, definitive local control 83% and local control with sphincter preservation 68%. Overall and stage for stage, there was no difference in overall, progression-free or cancer-specific survival, nor in local control, local-regional control, or sphincter preservation rates between patients treated with chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding acute or late toxicity. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis does not confirm the efficacy of one course of simultaneous Mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil, at least in association with full-dose radiotherapy incorporating Iridium-192 boost.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 66
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A five-year review of chemoradiotherapy practice in anal cancer: Radiotherapy audit results from a cancer centre in Wales, UK
    Tunio, Mutahar A.
    Davies, Nicki
    Caparros, Elliot
    Davies, Janis
    Foyle, Stuart
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2024, 110 (03): : 186 - 192
  • [22] The Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Leukocytosis in Patients With Anal Cancer Treated With Radical Chemoradiotherapy or Radiotherapy
    Banerjee, Robyn
    Roxin, George
    Eliasziw, Misha
    Joseph, Kurian
    MacLean, Anthony
    Buie, W. Donald
    Doll, Corinne
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (09) : 1036 - 1042
  • [23] Comparison of definitive chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in patients older than 75 years with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma A retrospective cohort study
    Zhao, Qian
    Hu, Guofang
    Xiao, Wei
    Chen, Yan
    Shen, Meng
    Tang, Qiang
    Ning, Xu
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (35)
  • [24] COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY - RADIOTHERAPY OF ANAL CANCER
    ZUCALI, R
    DOCI, R
    BOMBELLI, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (05): : 1221 - 1223
  • [25] Stridor: an unexpected complication from chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer
    Moe, M. M.
    Askill, C.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2009, 39 (04) : 313 - 314
  • [26] Chemoradiotherapy versus Radiotherapy Alone in Elderly Patients with Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Dawe, David E.
    Christiansen, David
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed
    Ellis, Peter M.
    Swaminath, Anand
    Rothney, Janet
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Mahmud, Salah
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (09) : S286 - S286
  • [27] Anal cancer: is neoadjuvant cisplatin chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy friend or foe?
    Glynne-Jones, Robert
    Mawdsley, Suzannah
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2008, 5 (12): : 692 - 693
  • [28] Chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer: clinical trials past, present and future
    Cooper, Rachel
    Casanova, Nathalie
    Sebag-Montefiore, David
    COLORECTAL CANCER, 2014, 3 (03) : 289 - 297
  • [29] Chemoradiotherapy with hyperthermia versus chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yea, Ji Woon
    Park, Jae Won
    Oh, Se An
    Park, Jaehyeon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2021, 38 (01) : 1333 - 1340
  • [30] Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus with radiotherapy alone for locally advanced salivary gland carcinoma among older patients
    Tanvetyanon, Tawee
    Fisher, Kate
    Caudell, Jimmy
    Otto, Kristen
    Padhya, Tapan
    Trotti, Andy
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 (06): : 863 - 870