IS UNDERSTANDING THE PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF TEACHERS A THEORY PRACTICE PROBLEM

被引:17
作者
CARR, D
机构
[1] Moray House Institute of Education, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ, Holyrood Road
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9752.1995.tb00363.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The currently fashionable professional ideal of reflective practice has focused on how good teaching might be informed by theoretical (invariably social scientific) enquiry and has been commonly construed as a matter of the effective application of theory,. This paper rejects technicist assumptions underpinning the idea of applied theory, tracing them to confusion between two different sorts of practical deliberation, phronesis and techne. Understanding professional reflection primarily in term of phronesis calls into doubt both the precise role of genuine theoretical studies in professional reflection and the very status as theoretical of the sort of the principled understanding and deliberation required for the wise conduct of education.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 331
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER, 1994, CAMBRIDGE J ED, V24
[2]  
ARISTOTLE, 1925, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS 2
[3]  
ARISTOTLE, 1925, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS 4
[4]  
ARISTOTLE, 1925, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS 5
[5]  
Bennett N., 1976, TEACHING STYLES PUPI
[6]  
BOOTH M, 1990, PARTNERSHIP INITIAL
[7]  
BOYSON R, 1975, BLACK PAPER
[8]  
CARR D, 1993, BRIT J ED STUDIES, V41
[9]  
CARR D, 1992, OXFORD REV ED, V18
[10]  
Carr D., 1993, SCOTTISH ED REV, V25