机构:
UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103
TAYLOR, U
[1
]
ZENTAY, Z
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103
ZENTAY, Z
[1
]
GANESH, V
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103
GANESH, V
[1
]
APUZZIO, J
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103
APUZZIO, J
[1
]
MURPHY, G
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103
MURPHY, G
[1
]
IFFY, L
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103
IFFY, L
[1
]
机构:
[1] UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,UNIV HOSP,NEW JERSEY MED SCH,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,F246,NEWARK,NJ 07103
A comparison of the yearly statistics of National Maternity Hospital (Dublin) and University Hospital (Newark) was undertaken for the years 1983-1989. The findings appear to indicate that after the elimination of major confounding factors, the substantially higher rates of Caesarean section in Newark (17.5% versus 5.8%) did not bring about a measurable reduction in the rate of neonatal losses. The impact of paediatric care upon the respective neonatal outcomes could not be assessed on the ground of the reviewed data.