Misoprostol Vaginal Pessary Versus Dinoproston Vaginal Gel in Induction of Labour

被引:0
作者
Farrukh, Rubina [1 ]
Zill-E-Huma [1 ]
Qayyum, Shumaila [1 ]
机构
[1] Sir Ganga Ram Hosp, Fatima Jinnah Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2014年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
Dinoprostone vaginal gel; misoprostol vaginal pesary; induction of labour;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare misoprostol vaginal pessary with dinoprostone vaginal gel to know which of these two agents is more safe and effective for induction of labour Method: A Interventional quasi experimental study was carried out in Sir Ganga Ram hospital, Lahore over a period of six months from 13th Feb, 2007 to 13th Aug, 2007. A total of 100 women at 37-42 months of gestation were assigned into two groups. Fifty women in group A received dinoprostone vaginal gel and 50 women in group B received misoprostol vaginal pessary. Results: 68% in group A and 87% in group B deliver within 24 hours of induction. 60% patients in group A and 56% in group B had spontaneous vaginal delivery, 64% patients in group A and 66% patients in group B required oxytocin for augmentation. Nausea and vomiting was observed in 8% patients in group-B with no case reported in group A. Fetal and maternal complications were also comparable in both groups. Overall babies delivered with good APGAR score at 1 & 5 minute interval. Conclusion: Both dinoprostone vaginal gel and misoprostol vaginal pessary appears to be equally safe and effective for induction of labour.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term - a randomised trial
    Kalkat, R. K.
    McMillan, E.
    Cooper, H.
    Palmer, K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 28 (07) : 695 - 699
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of induction of labour at term with a Foley catheter compared to vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel (PROBAAT trial)
    van Baaren, G. J.
    Jozwiak, M.
    Opmeer, B. C.
    Rengerink, K. Oude
    Benthem, M.
    Dijksterhuis, M. G. K.
    van Huizen, M. E.
    van der Salm, P. C. M.
    Schuitemaker, N. W. E.
    Papatsonis, D. N. M.
    Perquin, D. A. M.
    Porath, M.
    van der Post, J. A. M.
    Rijnders, R. J. P.
    Scheepers, H. C. J.
    Spaanderman, M.
    van Pampus, M. G.
    de Leeuw, J. W.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Bloemenkamp, K. W. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (08) : 987 - 995
  • [33] Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
    Kehl, Sven
    Born, Tilman
    Weiss, Christel
    Faschingbauer, Florian
    Pretscher, Jutta
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Dammer, Ulf
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 3
  • [34] Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
    Tan, P. C.
    Valiapan, S. D.
    Tay, P. Y. S.
    Omar, S. Z.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (07) : 824 - 832
  • [35] Induction of Labour - A Comparison between Misoprostol and Dinoprostone
    Akhtar, Ambreen
    Talib, Waseem
    Shami, Nabeela
    Anwar, Shaila
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2011, 5 (04): : 617 - 619
  • [36] Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour
    McMaster, K.
    Sanchez-Ramos, L.
    Kaunitz, A. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (04) : 468 - 476
  • [37] Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan
    Obeidat, Rawan A.
    Almaaitah, Mahmoud
    Ben-Sadon, Abeer
    Istaiti, Dina
    Rawashdeh, Hasan
    Hamadneh, Shereen
    Hammouri, Hanan
    Bataineh, Adel
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [38] Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan
    Rawan A. Obeidat
    Mahmoud Almaaitah
    Abeer Ben-Sadon
    Dina Istaiti
    Hasan Rawashdeh
    Shereen Hamadneh
    Hanan Hammouri
    Adel Bataineh
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [39] Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
    Aduloju, Olusola P.
    Akintayo, Akinyemi A.
    Adanikin, Abiodun I.
    Ade-Ojo, Idowu P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (06) : 578 - 584
  • [40] Comparison of Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labour in Primigravidas and Multigravidas
    Batool, Sadiqa
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2013, 7 (01): : 239 - 242