Cash-Benefit Policy and Childbearing Decisions in Norway

被引:10
作者
Aassve, Arnstein [1 ]
lappegard, Trude [2 ]
机构
[1] Bocconi Univ, Carlo F Dondena Ctr Res Social Dynam, Milan, Italy
[2] Stat Norway, Res Dept, POB 8131 Dep, NO-0033 Oslo, Norway
关键词
childcare cash benefit; education; family policy; fertility timing; Norway; second birth;
D O I
10.1080/01494929.2010.490094
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This report analyzes Norway's childcare cash-benefit policy and its relation to fertility decision making among Norwegian women with respect to having a second child. Using information from Norwegian registers, which include information on education and birth timing, the study's focus was on the childcare cash-benefit policy introduced in 1998. Both acceptance of childcare cash benefits and subsequent fertility timing were strongly influenced by women's educational attainment. Norwegian couples chose different strategies concerning work, childcare, and childbearing. Those individuals who were associated with a home scenario, taking the maximum length of cash benefits, transitioned more quickly to a second birth than did others. In contrast, those individuals who were associated with a work scenario, taking none of the cash benefits, proceededmuch later, whereas those associated with a mixed scenario, taking cash benefits for a shorter period, were less likely to have a second birth in the near-term but more likely later on. Mixed-scenario couples may have returned to work as a means to reestablish eligibility for parental leave benefits before having a second birth. Whereas the policy appears to have accelerated birth timing, it is not clear whether the policy has increased overall fertility levels.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 169
页数:21
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Aassve A, 2009, EUR J POPUL, V25, P67, DOI 10.1007/s10680-008-9158-6
[2]   Do child-care characteristics influence continued child bearing in Sweden? An investigation of the quantity, quality, and price dimension [J].
Andersson, G ;
Duvander, AZ ;
Hank, K .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2004, 14 (04) :407-418
[3]  
Andersson G., 2004, DEMOGR RES, V3, P155, DOI [10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.7, DOI 10.4054/DEMRES.2004.S3.7]
[4]  
Andersson G, 2006, DEMOGR RES, V14, P51
[5]  
Becker G. S., 1981, TREATISE FAMILY
[6]  
Cattaneo M. D., 2007, EFFICIENT SEMIPARAME
[7]   A MICROECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE TIMING OF BIRTHS [J].
CIGNO, A ;
ERMISCH, J .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1989, 33 (04) :737-760
[8]  
Cigno A., 1989, DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE E, P133
[9]   The effect of child care and part time opportunities on participation and fertility decisions in Italy [J].
Del Boca, D .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2002, 15 (03) :549-573
[10]   Education and second birth rates in Denmark 1981-1994 [J].
Gerster, Mette ;
Keiding, Niels ;
Knudsen, Lisbeth B. ;
Strandberg-Larsen, Katrine .
DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, 2007, 17 :181-210