Learning from friends: measuring influence in a dyadic computer instructional setting

被引:11
作者
Delay, Dawn [1 ]
Hartl, Amy C. [1 ]
Laursen, Brett [1 ]
Denner, Jill [2 ]
Werner, Linda [3 ]
Campe, Shannon [2 ]
Ortiz, Eloy [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Psychol, 3200 Coll Ave, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA
[2] ETR Associates, Dept Res, Santa Cruz, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Comp Sci, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
friend influence; computer programming; distinguishable dyad APIM;
D O I
10.1080/1743727X.2013.784961
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Data collected from partners in a dyadic instructional setting are, by definition, not statistically independent. As a consequence, conventional parametric statistical analyses of change and influence carry considerable risk of bias. In this article, we illustrate a strategy to overcome this obstacle: the longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model (APIM). Participants included 60 girls and 100 boys enrolled in public middle schools, who ranged in age from 10 to 14 at the outset. Students worked in pairs assigned by teachers. At the beginning and end of the instructional period, students completed surveys rating the degree to which the partner was a friend, confidence in one's own computing skills, and computer programming knowledge. APIM analyses revealed partner influence over the acquisition of computer programming skills among friends but not nonfriends. Students with higher initial levels of confidence in their own computing skills were more apt to be influenced by friends. This association was especially strong when confident partners were paired with friends who knew relatively more about computer programming.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 205
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]  
Goodlad J. I., 1984, PLACE CALLED SCH PRO
[22]  
Green-Demers I., 2003, MOTIVATIONS GOALS FU
[23]   CONTROL OF ATTRIBUTIONS ABOUT SELF THROUGH SELF-HANDICAPPING STRATEGIES - APPEAL OF ALCOHOL AND ROLE OF UNDERACHIEVEMENT [J].
JONES, EE ;
BERGLAS, S .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1978, 4 (02) :200-206
[24]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[25]   HOMOPHILY, SELECTION, AND SOCIALIZATION IN ADOLESCENT FRIENDSHIPS [J].
KANDEL, DB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1978, 84 (02) :427-436
[26]  
Kashy D. A., 2008, MODELING DYADIC INTE, P165, DOI 10.4324/9780203892763-12
[28]  
Kenny D. A., 2006, DYADIC DATA ANAL
[29]   Models of non-independence in dyadic research [J].
Kenny, DA .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1996, 13 (02) :279-294
[30]   Dyadic and group perspectives on close relationships [J].
Laursen, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 29 (02) :97-100