The Theoretical Background of Understanding Urban Identity in the Anthropological Perspective

被引:0
作者
Karpovets, Maksym [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Ostroh Acad, Dept Cultural Studies, Ostroh, Ukraine
来源
KYIV-MOHYLA HUMANITIES JOURNAL | 2014年 / 01期
关键词
urban identity; cultural landscape; everyday life; anthropology; urban anthropology; philosophical anthropology; philosophy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In the article, the theoretical background of the interpretation of urban identity is given using examples from anthropological studies. Urban identity is interpreted in terms of corporeality, memory and history of the city, and community. It is interpreted as a conflict of own and alien, anonymous and public, unique and secondary parts inside the cultural space of identity. The anthropology of the city offers a range of perspectives in the interpretation of identity, particularly in the context of corporeality. Another important thing is the cultural connection with history and memory. The defining feature of identity is the way of creating its own (hi) story of the city. Urban identity also appears to be the preservation of the symbolic capital of the city, including certain values, customs, rules, legends etc. Moreover, it gives rise to a permanent exploration of sustained ways of its transmission to the next generations. The findings of diffe-rent anthropological studies illustrate the complex character of the phenomenon and introduce possible theoretical frames for further understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 93
页数:17
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Al-Zubaidi Layla, URBAN ANTHR OVERVIEW
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, PRACTICE EVERYDAY LI
  • [3] Basham R., 1978, URBAN ANTHR CROSS CU
  • [4] Bhandari Amrit Kumar, 2010, HIMALAYAN J SOCIOLOG, V4, P1
  • [5] Borer Michael Ian, 2006, CITY COMMUNITY, V5, P181
  • [6] Castells Manuel., 2010, POWER IDENTITY
  • [7] Curtis Barry, 2002, UNKNOWN CITY EDITED, P54
  • [8] de Souza Marcelo Lopes, 2010, INTERFACE-J NEW MUS, V2, P315
  • [9] Ernst Cassirer, 1944, ESSAY MAN INTRO PHIL
  • [10] Heidegger M.., 1997, BEING TIME