RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW OF TORTS, VOLUME IV: A COMPARISON BETWEEN AMERICAN AND ENGLISH LAW

被引：2
作者：
Goodhart, Arthur L.
机构：
来源：
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW AND AMERICAN LAW REGISTER | 1943年 / 91卷 / 06期
关键词：
D O I：
10.2307/3309314
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：487 / 516
页数：30
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW OF TORTS, vol 4, Division, Chapter 41 [J].
McDougal, Myres S. ;
Runyon, Charles .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1940, 49 (08) :1502-1507
[22]   The 'Torts' in Civil Offenses in English law [J].
不详 .
LAW QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1911, 27 (105) :124-124
[23]   CASES ON THE LAW OF TORTS SELECTED FROM DECISIONS OF ENGLISH AND AMERICAN COURTS [J].
Goodrich, Herbert F. .
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1918, 2 (02) :161-162
[24]   The Law of Torts: a treatise on the English Law of Liability for Civil Injuries [J].
不详 .
LAW QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1908, 24 (93) :84-85
[25]   REFLECTIONS ON THE RESTATEMENT OF THE LAW OF AMERICAN INDIANS [J].
Fletcher, Matthew L. M. .
WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 2022, 97 (03) :699-702
[26]   THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE AND THE PROJECTED RESTATEMENT OF THE COMMON LAW IN AMERICA [J].
Wickersham, George W. .
LAW QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1927, 43 (172) :449-474
[27]   THE PLACE OF ACTING IN INTENTIONAL MULTISTATE TORTS: LAW AND REASON VERSUS THE RESTATEMENT [J].
Ehrenzweig, Albert A. .
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1951, 36 (01) :1-49
[28]   THE MOST SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP IN THE CONFLICTS LAW OF TORTS - LAW AND REASON VERSUS THE RESTATEMENT 2ND [J].
EHRENZWEIG, AA .
LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS, 1963, 28 (04) :700-705
[29]   A SELECTION OF CASES ILLUSTRATIVE OF THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORTS [J].
不详 .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1905, 19 (02) :147-148
[30]   Cases illustrating the Principles of the English Law of Torts [J].
不详 .
LAW QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1905, 21 (81) :79-79
12345