CONSTRAINTS ON THE EVOLUTION OF ATTRACTIVE TRAITS - SELECTION IN MALE AND FEMALE ZEBRA FINCHES

被引:77
作者
PRICE, DK [1 ]
BURLEY, NT [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ILLINOIS, DEPT ECOL ETHOL & EVOLUT, URBANA, IL 61801 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/285718
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We examined natural and sexual selection in a laboratory population of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), with a principal focus on bill color. Previous studies indicated that females prefer males with redder bills, whereas males prefer females with less red bills, For male red bill color, both the selection differential and selection gradient coefficients were significantly positive with fitness (the number of offspring surviving to independence), which was primarily due to differences in the time to the first nest and in reproductive rate but not to differences in survival. In contrast, for female red bill color, there was significant negative selection, which was due to differences in most stages of reproductive and survival selection but not to differences in the time to the first nest. There were no significant correlations between male or female bill color and offspring weight or postfledging survival. All male plumage color traits (breast band, cheek patch, flank patch) showed nonsignificant selection for increase in size due to both the time to the first nest and for reproductive rate but showed selection for decrease in size due to survival. Tarsus length was the only male trait to show significant selection for decrease in size, The opposing selection on red bill color between the sexes indicates that the positive genetic correlation between male and female red bill color may constrain the evolutionary rate of red bill sexual dichromatism.
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 934
页数:27
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] SEX STEROID-LEVELS IN DEVELOPING AND ADULT MALE AND FEMALE ZEBRA FINCHES (POEPHILA-GUTTATA)
    ADKINSREGAN, E
    ABDELNABI, M
    MOBARAK, M
    OTTINGER, MA
    [J]. GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1990, 78 (01) : 93 - 109
  • [2] ANDERSSON M, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P804, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00540.x
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, TEACHING CHILDREN TH
  • [4] ARNOLD SJ, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P720, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00345.x
  • [5] ARNOLD SJ, 1984, EVOLUTION, V38, P709, DOI [10.2307/2408383, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00344.x]
  • [6] BIRKHEAD TR, 1990, BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY S, V27, P234
  • [7] A METHOD FOR TESTING ADAPTIVE HYPOTHESES OF MATE CHOICE
    BOAKE, CRB
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1986, 127 (05) : 654 - 666
  • [8] BOWMAKER JK, 1970, TRENDS NEURAL SC AUG, P196
  • [9] Brush A., 1981, CAROTENOIDS COLORANT, P539
  • [10] BURLEY N, 1987, ETHOLOGY, V76, P133