Risk assessment of plant protection products

被引:6
|
作者
Hardy, Tony [1 ]
Bopp, Stephanie [1 ]
Egsmose, Mark [1 ]
Fontier, Herman [1 ]
Mohimont, Luc [1 ]
Steinkellner, Hans [1 ]
Streissl, Franz [1 ]
机构
[1] EFSA, Parma, Italy
关键词
Human health risk assessment; residues; fate and behaviour; ecotoxicology; environmental risk assessment; pesticides; plant protection products;
D O I
10.2903/j.efsa.2012.s1010
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
EFSA's Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) provides independent scientific advice in the field of risk assessment of plant protection products (PPPs, pesticides). Since its establishment in 2003 under Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, it has delivered a series of scientific outputs in support of evaluation of pesticide active substances, establishing scientific principles and guidance documents in the field of pesticide risk assessment and in support of decision making of European Union (EU) law makers. Next to a series of scientific opinions evaluating specific adverse effects of PPPs for human health (like for instance carcinogenicity) the Panel also delivered scientific opinions on general principles in the field of human health risk assessment (like reference value setting) and is, in particular over the last years, very much engaged in development of methodologies to meet new challenges in regulatory risk assessments such as assessment of toxicity of pesticide metabolites and potential cumulative effects of pesticides to human health. Fate, behaviour and transformation of pesticides after their application and consequent release to the environment are a major aspect of pesticide risk assessment. The PPR Panel has achieved major accomplishments by delivering guidance and scientific opinions on degradation in soil, exposure of soil organisms and assessment of environmental risks by use of pesticides in greenhouses or grown under cover. A series of scientific opinions have been delivered also in the field of environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Scientific output covered specific issues arising in the peer review of specific active substances, revision of data requirements, development of risk assessment methodologies and the development of guidance documents. A major milestone of the PPR Panel was the development of the methodological framework for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides in view of the future dialogue between risk managers and risk assessors during the next steps of the revision of the ecotoxicology guidance documents. (C) European Food Safety Authority, 2012.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Placing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the risk assessment test battery of plant protection products (PPPs)
    Gilvani Carla Mallmann
    José Paulo Sousa
    Ingvar Sundh
    Silvia Pieper
    Maria Arena
    Sonia Purin da Cruz
    Osmar Klauberg-Filho
    Ecotoxicology, 2018, 27 : 809 - 818
  • [32] Progress in the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products in Brazil: An overview of aquatic organism proposals
    Cione, Ana Paola
    Santos, Gustavo Souza
    Casallanovo, Fabio
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 (06) : 1787 - 1792
  • [33] A proposed risk assessment methodology for mixtures of plant protection products containing active substances for operators, workers, bystanders: An impact study based on plant protection products authorised in France
    Fastier, A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 205 : S211 - S212
  • [34] Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms
    Ockleford, Colin
    Adriaanse, Paulien
    Berny, Philippe
    Brock, Theodorus
    Duquesne, Sabine
    Grilli, Sandro
    Hernandez-Jerez, Antonio F.
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Kuhl, Thomas
    Laskowski, Ryszard
    Machera, Kyriaki
    Pelkonen, Olavi
    Pieper, Silvia
    Stemmer, Michael
    Sundh, Ingvar
    Teodorovic, Ivana
    Tiktak, Aaldrik
    Topping, Chris J.
    Wolterink, Gerrit
    Craig, Peter
    de Jong, Frank
    Manachini, Barbara
    Sousa, Paulo
    Swarowsky, Klaus
    Auteri, Domenica
    Arena, Maria
    Rob, Smith
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2017, 15 (02)
  • [35] Technical experiences made with the litter bag test as required for the risk assessment of plant protection products in soil
    Dinter, Axel
    Coulson, Mike
    Heimbach, Fred
    Keppler, Juergen
    Krieg, Wolfgang
    Koelzer, Uschi
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2008, 8 (05) : 333 - 339
  • [36] Estimation of exposure dose and operator risk assessment of plant protection products with different dermal absorption default
    You, Are Sun
    Oh, Jin A.
    Park, Sujin
    Jo, Youmi
    Park, Yeon-Ki
    Lee, Je Bong
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2017, 280 : S173 - S173
  • [37] Non-dietary risk assessment of secondary metabolites of micro-organisms in plant protection products
    Pfau, W.
    Hinarejos Esteve, E.
    Aragao, I.
    Borja, M.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S246 - S246
  • [38] Problem Formulation for an Assessment of Risk to Honey Bees from Applications of Plant Protection Products to Agricultural Crops
    Fischer, D.
    Alix, A.
    Coulson, M.
    Delorme, P.
    Moriarty, T.
    Pettis, J.
    Steeger, T.
    Wisk, J. D.
    PESTICIDE RISK ASSESSMENT FOR POLLINATORS, 2014, : 28 - 43
  • [39] Reflections on Bird and Mammal Risk Assessment for Plant Protection Products in the European Union: Past, Present, and Future
    Brooks, Amy C.
    Fryer, Mike
    Lawrence, Alan
    Pascual, Juan
    Sharpk, Rachel
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 36 (03) : 565 - 575
  • [40] Using problem formulation for an efficient, fit-for-purpose risk assessment of microbial plant protection products
    Steenbergh, Anne K.
    Arts, Gertie
    Bakker, Peter A. H. M.
    de Boer, Wietse
    Glandorf, Debora C. M.
    ter Horst, Mechteld M. S.
    de Jonge, Rob
    de Kogel, Willem Jan
    Kohl, Jurgen
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2025, 37 (01)