Mortality and the Factors Affecting Patients Over 65 Age with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail

被引:2
|
作者
Cengie, Omer [1 ]
Demir, Necdet [2 ]
Dirvar, Ferdi [3 ]
Ceylan, Hasan Huseyin [4 ]
机构
[1] Mus State Hosp, Clin Orthoped & Traumatol, Mus, Turkey
[2] Biruni Univ Hosp, Clin Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Bone Dis Train, Clin Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Lutfiye Nuri Burat State Hosp, Clin Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Intertrochanteric fractures; mortality; age; proximal femoral nail;
D O I
10.4274/BTDMJB.20180108023033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We aimed to investigate the factors affecting postoperative mortality associated with intertrochanteric femoral fractures in patients age 65 and older who were treated with osteosynthesis with a proximal femoral nail (PFN). Materials and Methods: Patients were categorized and examined according to age, gender, pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores, time of surgery and type of anesthesia. Patients with more than two systemic additional diseases and an ASA of score 5 were not included in the study. Post -operative mortality results and the factors associated with mortality were investigated. Results: Thirty-one patients (36.1%) were male and 55 (63.9%) were female. The mean age was 78.31 years and forty-eight of the patients were under 80 years old (55.8%) and 38 were over 80 years old (44.2%). According to the Jensen fracture classification, 35 (40.6%) of the patients were evaluated as type 3,15 (17.4%) patients were type 4 and 36 (42%) patients were type 5. The ASA score was used for preoperative risk assessment. Thirty (34.8%) patients had an ASA score of 1-2, while 56 (65.2%) had an ASA asore of 3-4. Patients were categorized as "3 days before" or "3 days after" according to the time of surgery, and the mean time to surgery was 3.7 days. The type of anesthesia was classified as general and regional with 65 patients (75.5%) operating under regional anesthesia and 21 patients (24.4%) under general anesthesia. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, the mortality rate was 20.9% (18/86). Mortality was significantly higher in patients over 80 years old (36.8% vs 8.3%, p=0604). Conclusion: Patients 80 years and older are at serious risk for mortality when they have unstable trochanteric fractures treated with PFN. These patients are at especially high risk for mortality within the first year and should be monitored closely.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 407
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stabilization of unstable intertrochanteric fractures with the proximal femoral nail
    Sehmisch, S.
    Rieckenberg, J.
    Dresing, K.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2013, 25 (01): : 63 - 83
  • [2] Prognostic factors affecting survival of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures over 90 years treated with proximal femoral nailing
    Ergin, Omer Naci
    Bayram, Serkan
    Anarat, Fikret Berkan
    Yagci, Taha Furkan
    Balci, Halil Ibrahim
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2020, 46 (03) : 663 - 669
  • [3] The factors that affect blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail in the elderly
    Tuzun, Harun Yasin
    Bilekli, Ahmet Burak
    Ersen, Omer
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 48 (03) : 1879 - 1884
  • [4] The factors that affect blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail in the elderly
    Harun Yasin Tüzün
    Ahmet Burak Bilekli
    Ömer Erşen
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2022, 48 : 1879 - 1884
  • [5] Hemiarthroplasty with cementless intramedullary stem versus proximal femoral nail in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients
    Kilinc, Seyran
    Pazarci, Ozhan
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2021, 87 (ES1): : 36 - 43
  • [6] Proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN)-an innovative surgical method for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures
    Zhao, Haiyue
    Deng, Xiangtian
    Liu, Weijian
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Lei
    Zhang, Yiran
    Wang, Zhongzheng
    Wang, Yuchuan
    Lian, Xiaodong
    Hou, Zhiyong
    Zhang, Qi
    Zhang, Yingze
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (04) : 1089 - 1099
  • [7] An overview of patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with proximal femoral nail fixation using important criteria
    Aygun, Umit
    Senocak, Eyup
    Aksay, Mehmet Fatih
    Cicek, Ali Can
    Halac, Orkun
    Toy, Serdar
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [8] Intramedullary Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures with the Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN)
    Akhil P. Verheyden
    Christoph Josten
    European Journal of Trauma, 2004, 30 (3): : 197 - 206
  • [9] A Comparison of the Clinicoradiological Outcomes of Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated Using Proximal Femoral Nail and Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation
    Bhardwaj, Shubham
    Sakale, Harshal
    Agrawal, Alok C.
    Kar, Bikram
    Dash, Rudra Narayan
    Rai, Alok
    Garg, Ankit Kumar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [10] Prospective Comparative Study Between Proximal Femoral Nail vs. Screw Augmented Proximal Femoral Nail in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur
    Rajput, Ajay K.
    Gupta, Pradeep K.
    Gill, Simrat Pal S.
    Singh, Santosh Kumar
    Raj, Manish
    Singh, Jasveer
    Dubey, Pawan
    Sharma, Pranav
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (12)