PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF ABDOMINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY BEFORE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

被引:19
作者
LEE, CL [1 ]
WU, CH [1 ]
CHEN, TK [1 ]
LAI, YC [1 ]
YANG, SS [1 ]
HUANG, CS [1 ]
CHEN, DF [1 ]
机构
[1] CATHAY GEN HOSP,DEPT SURG,TAIPEI 106,TAIWAN
关键词
ULTRASONOGRAPHY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/00004836-199303000-00007
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
To investigate the role of abdominal ultrasonography (US) in predicting possible difficulties during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we performed preoperative US evaluation prospectively in 82 consecutive patients. We correlated our predictions of ''easy'' and ''difficult'' with difficulties experienced at operation in surgery. The binary outcomes were analyzed by taking both easy category of US and surgical operation as positive results and both difficult category as negative results. We obtained satisfactory sensitivity (93.8%), accuracy (81.4%), and positive predictive value (84.7%), but low specificity (35.3%) and negative predictive value (60%). The highly positive results were the result of careful US examination. The low specificity and negative predictive value were attributed to the fact that most surgically difficult cases were due to adhesions around the gallbladder, difficult indeed to detect at US. We conclude that thorough abdominal US examination before laparoscopic cholecystectomy is useful in preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even if it not infrequently fails to predict the surgically difficult cases mainly due to adhesions around the gallbladder.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 116
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] ROUTINE OR SELECTED INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    BERCI, G
    SACKIER, JM
    PAZPARTLOW, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) : 355 - 360
  • [2] BLATNER ME, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P646
  • [3] THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE WITH LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    CUSCHIERI, A
    DUBOIS, F
    MOUIEL, J
    MOURET, P
    BECKER, H
    BUESS, G
    TREDE, M
    TROIDL, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) : 385 - 387
  • [4] TRADITIONAL VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    GADACZ, TR
    TALAMINI, MA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) : 336 - 338
  • [5] Huang C S, 1991, J Formos Med Assoc, V90, P893
  • [6] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - INITIAL EXPERIENCE
    JONES, RM
    FLETCHER, DR
    MACLELLAN, DG
    LOWE, AW
    HARDY, KJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 61 (04): : 261 - 266
  • [7] CONVENTIONAL VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY AND THE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    NEUGEBAUER, E
    TROIDL, H
    SPANGENBERGER, W
    DIETRICH, A
    LEFERING, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [8] SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 100 INITIAL PATIENTS
    PETERS, JH
    ELLISON, EC
    INNES, JT
    LISS, JL
    NICHOLS, KE
    LOMANO, JM
    ROBY, SR
    FRONT, ME
    CAREY, LC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1991, 213 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [9] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - AN INITIAL REPORT
    SALKY, BA
    BAUER, JJ
    KREEL, I
    GELERNT, IM
    GORFINE, SR
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [10] TOMPKINS RK, 1990, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V125, P1245