Medical Risk Assessment - Using the Example of Cancer Screening

被引:10
作者
Gigerenzer, Gerd [1 ]
Wegwarth, Odette [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Bildungsforsch, Konigin Luise Str 5, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN | 2008年 / 102卷 / 09期
关键词
informed consent; risk communication; informed patient; breast cancer; mammography; statistical reasoning; medical training; continuing; medical education and training;
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2008.09.008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Knowledge about the benefits and harms of cancer screening is essential for physicians and patients making informed decisions. However, we will demonstrate that many physicians' and patients' knowledge of cancer screening is alarmingly limited. Only about 5 percent of the patients correctly estimate its benefits, while most either highly overestimate these benefits or do not know about their magnitude. Relying on a doctor's judgment alone is not always advantageous: One third of the gynaecologists investigated were ignorant of the benefits of mammography screening, and 79 percent were unable to interpret a positive result (the positive predictive value). Nor does consulting a patient brochure guarantee more knowledge, as only few brochures contain transparent and evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of cancer screenings. Hence, informed consent is unlikely to take place in everyday practice. Truly informed decision making in medicine requires more evidence and transparency for patients as well as a better statistical training of physicians.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 519
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Do citizens have minimum medical knowledge? A survey [J].
Bachmann, Lucas M. ;
Gutzwiller, Florian S. ;
Puhan, Milo A. ;
Steurer, Johann ;
Steurer-Stey, Claudia ;
Gigerenzer, Gerd .
BMC MEDICINE, 2007, 5 (1)
[2]   Health professionals' and service users' interpretation of screening test results: experimental study [J].
Bramwell, Ros ;
West, Helen ;
Salmon, Peter .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7562) :284-286A
[3]   A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats [J].
Covey, Judith .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) :638-654
[4]   Benign breast disease - The risks of communicating risk [J].
Elmore, JG ;
Gigerenzer, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (03) :297-299
[5]   Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight [J].
Gigerenzer, G ;
Edwards, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7417) :741-744
[6]   HOW TO IMPROVE BAYESIAN REASONING WITHOUT INSTRUCTION - FREQUENCY FORMATS [J].
GIGERENZER, G ;
HOFFRAGE, U .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1995, 102 (04) :684-704
[7]   AIDS counselling for low-risk clients [J].
Gigerenzer, G ;
Hoffrage, U ;
Ebert, A .
AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 1998, 10 (02) :197-211
[8]   Overcoming difficulties in Bayesian reasoning: A reply to Lewis and Keren (1999) and Mellers and McGraw (1999) [J].
Gigerenzer, G ;
Hoffrage, U .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (02) :425-430
[9]  
Gigerenzer G, 2004, EINMALEINS SKEPSIS R
[10]  
Gigerenzer G, 2008, SURVEY HLTH KN UNPUB