FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN PROPERTY EDUCATION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN BLENDED AND ONLINE LEARNING

被引:0
|
作者
Yam, Sharon [1 ]
Rossini, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
formative assessment; online test; practice quiz; property education; summative assessment;
D O I
10.1080/14445921.2013.11104376
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Formative assessment is of vital importance to enhance student learning. Students are able to apply their knowledge by completing formative exercises and given the opportunity to rectify their mistakes prior to attempting the summative assessment. Feedback provided for formative assessment has been recognised as central in enhancing student learning as students can use this to reinforce their understanding of the subject. The paper is based on an exploratory research project using student survey data as well as records of students' performance and activities over the first semester of 2012. The purpose is to study how two groups of property students exposed to different modes of learning responded to the online and traditional formative assessment. The student perceptions and the statistical relationship between formative and summative assessment will be analysed using quantitative analysis techniques. The research shows that both groups of students, internal (blended) and external (online) students, have benefited from the range of formative assessments offered in this first-year property course, albeit to a different extent. Property academics should, therefore, make good use of formative assessment to enhance student engagement and virtual classroom might be a solution to further engage external students. Besides highlighting challenges, student perceptions and the usefulness of formative assessment, the paper also provides recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 127
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monitoring large class practice in a virtual learning environment: online formative assessment experience
    Pishchukhina, Olga
    Gordieieva, Daria
    Rainer, Austen
    2023 32ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR EDUCATION IN ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING, EAEEIE, 2023, : 7 - 11
  • [42] Introducing a Formative E-Assessment System to Improve Online Learning Experience and Performance
    Hettiarachchi, Enosha
    Mor, Enric
    Antonia Huertas, M.
    Guerrero-Roldan, Ana-Elena
    JOURNAL OF UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2015, 21 (08) : 1001 - 1021
  • [43] FORMATIVE AND PEER ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Morze, Nataliia
    Vember, Viktoriia
    Varchenko-Trotsenko, Liliia
    EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHERS' SKILLS IN THE AREA OF ICT AND E-LEARNING, 2017, 9 : 159 - 179
  • [44] A Brief Analysis of the Formative Assessment of College English Learning
    刘贝贝
    海外英语, 2017, (01) : 222 - 224
  • [45] Develop a formative assessment protocol to examine the practice of Popping dance in students online learning
    Ling, Xi
    Yang, Zhi
    Wei, Ming Tao
    Bai, Yu Jie
    Yuan, Ye
    Cui, Yan Shuo
    Li, Bin Bin
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [46] A Study on the Correlation between Second Language Learning Motivation and Formative Assessment
    何爱玲
    杨坚
    海外英语, 2014, (01) : 41 - 43
  • [47] The use of blended synchronous learning for property education in and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
    Cheung, Ka Ling
    Wu, Hao
    PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 41 (02) : 228 - 243
  • [48] Transforming assessment in accounting education to align with online learning
    Ali, Irshad
    Narayan, Anil K.
    Gedera, Dilani
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 34 (04) : 536 - 547
  • [49] Investigating the dynamics of formative assessment: relationships between teacher knowledge, assessment practice and learning
    Herman, Joan
    Osmundson, Ellen
    Dai, Yunyun
    Ringstaff, Cathy
    Timms, Michael
    ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2015, 22 (03) : 344 - 367
  • [50] A comparative analysis of the use of metadiscourse markers in online formative and summative assessment
    Luisa Carrio-Pastor, Ma
    TEJUELO-DIDACTICA DE LA LENGUA Y LA LITERATURA, 2021, 34 : 261 - 291