Randomized Trial Comparing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy: Early Perioperative Outcomes Appear Improved With a Minimally Invasive Approach

被引:5
|
作者
Levy, Ryan M. [1 ]
Pennathur, Arjun [1 ]
Luketich, James D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Med Ctr Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
esophagectomy; surgical procedures; minimally invasive; postoperative complications; morbidity;
D O I
10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.10.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Esophagectomy is an important curative treatment modality for esophageal cancer, but is a complex operation with associated risks. A minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy may decrease the risks associated with resection. Recently, an important study was published in the Lancet by Biere and colleagues that reported the results of a randomized study, with the primary endpoint of postoperative pulmonary infection, comparing minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The findings from this trial confirm the data from previous, non-randomized studies and highlight the substantial early postoperative benefits of minimally invasive esophagectomy. © 2012.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 154
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy
    G. Collins
    E. Johnson
    T. Kroshus
    R. Ganz
    K. Batts
    J. Seng
    O. Nwaneri
    D. Dunn
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2006, 20 : 298 - 301
  • [22] MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY VS. TRANSHIATAL OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY IN ACHALASIA: A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Albuquerque Fontan, Alberto Jorge
    Batista-Neto, Joao
    Pastl Pontes, Ana Carolina
    Nepomuceno, Marcos da Costa
    Muritiba, Tadeu Gusmao
    Furtado, Romulo da Silva
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (03):
  • [23] Experience with minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Collins, G
    Johnson, E
    Kroshus, T
    Ganz, R
    Batts, K
    Seng, J
    Nwaneri, O
    Dunn, D
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2006, 20 (02): : 298 - 301
  • [24] Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer
    Meng, Fanyu
    Li, Yin
    Ma, Haibo
    Yan, Ming
    Zhang, Ruixiang
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2014, 6 (09) : 1218 - 1224
  • [25] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in the Community Hospital Setting
    Hanna, Erin M.
    Norton, H. James
    Reames, Mark K.
    Salo, Jonathan C.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 20 (03) : 521 - +
  • [26] Patient reported outcomes (PROs) after minimally invasive and open esophagectomy
    Brady, John J.
    Witek, Tadeusz D.
    Luketich, James D.
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2020, 12 (11) : 6920 - 6924
  • [27] Open, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Approaches for Esophagectomy What Is the Approach Algorithm?
    Witek, Tadeusz D.
    Melvin, Thomas J.
    Luketich, James D.
    Sarkaria, Inderpal S.
    THORACIC SURGERY CLINICS, 2020, 30 (03) : 269 - +
  • [28] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Techniques and Outcomes
    Petropoulos, K.
    Macheras, A.
    Liakakos, T.
    Misiakos, E. P.
    CHIRURGIA, 2015, 110 (02) : 99 - 108
  • [29] Oncologic outcomes in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma
    Devaud, Nicolas A.
    Yeung, Jonathan C.
    Darling, Gail E.
    VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 6
  • [30] Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature
    Verhage, R. J. J.
    Hazebroek, E. J.
    Boone, J.
    Van Hillegersberg, R.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2009, 64 (02) : 135 - 146