Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS-1 altimetry: Ridge segmentation versus spreading rate

被引:591
作者
Sandwell, David T. [1 ]
Smith, Walter H. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] NOAA, Lab Satellite Altimetry, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
OCEANIC TRANSFORM FAULTS; SATELLITE ALTIMETRY; SEA-FLOOR; THERMAL CONTRACTION; GEODETIC MISSION; RATE DEPENDENCE; BATHYMETRIC PREDICTION; MESOSCALE VARIABILITY; FIELD RECOVERY; FRACTURE-ZONES;
D O I
10.1029/2008JB006008
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Three approaches are used to reduce the error in the satellite-derived marine gravity anomalies. First, we have retracked the raw waveforms from the ERS-1 and Geosat/GM missions resulting in improvements in range precision of 40% and 27%, respectively. Second, we have used the recently published EGM2008 global gravity model as a reference field to provide a seamless gravity transition from land to ocean. Third, we have used a biharmonic spline interpolation method to construct residual vertical deflection grids. Comparisons between shipboard gravity and the global gravity grid show errors ranging from 2.0 mGal in the Gulf of Mexico to 4.0 mGal in areas with rugged seafloor topography. The largest errors of up to 20 mGal occur on the crests of narrow large seamounts. The global spreading ridges are well resolved and show variations in ridge axis morphology and segmentation with spreading rate. For rates less than about 60 mm/a the typical ridge segment is 50-80 km long while it increases dramatically at higher rates (100-1000 km). This transition spreading rate of 60 mm/a also marks the transition from axial valley to axial high. We speculate that a single mechanism controls both transitions; candidates include both lithospheric and asthenospheric processes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   A STATISTICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN RIDGE CREST OFFSETS AND SPREADING RATE [J].
ABBOTT, D .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1986, 13 (02) :157-160
[2]   Improving the Jason-1 Ground Retracking to Better Account for Attitude Effects [J].
Amarouche, L. ;
Thibaut, P. ;
Zanife, O. Z. ;
Dumont, J. -P. ;
Vincent, P. ;
Steunou, N. .
MARINE GEODESY, 2004, 27 (1-2) :171-197
[3]   Global marine gravity field from the ERS-1 and Geosat geodetic mission altimetry [J].
Andersen, OB ;
Knudsen, P .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1998, 103 (C4) :8129-8137
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, P EUR GEOSC UN GEN A
[5]  
[Anonymous], SATELLITE ALTIMETRY
[6]   3-D MODELING OF SEAMOUNT TOPOGRAPHY FROM SATELLITE ALTIMETRY [J].
BAUDRY, N ;
CALMANT, S .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1991, 18 (06) :1143-1146
[7]  
Bendat JS., 2011, Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures
[9]  
Bird P., 2002, GEODYNAMICS, V30, P201, DOI 10.1029/GD030p0203
[10]   MACHINE CONTOURING USING MINIMUM CURVATURE [J].
BRIGGS, IC .
GEOPHYSICS, 1974, 39 (01) :39-48