3-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATION OF HARRINGTON DISTRACTION INSTRUMENTATION FOR SURGICAL-CORRECTION OF SCOLIOSIS

被引:21
作者
STOKES, IAF
GARDNERMORSE, M
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation University of Vermont Burlington, Burlington, VT
关键词
SPINE; SCOLIOSIS; BIOMECHANICS; SURGERY; HARRINGTON INSTRUMENTATION; FINITE ELEMENTS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199312000-00015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Harrington distraction rod surgery on six female patients with idiopathic scoliosis was simulated in three-dimensional osseoligamentous finite element models with individual geometry taken from preoperative stereo roentgenographic reconstructions of the spine and ribcage and compared with the measured outcome. Boundary conditions at the ends of the spine were used to maintain pelvis and head alignment. Published material and flexibility properties were used. The amount of hook distraction was calculated from measured changes in the distance between the hook sites (range, 13-27 mm). Initial simulations underestimated the Cobb angle correction by an average 6%. They underestimated the spinal elongation by 36% and predicted an average 12-degrees increase in kyphosis angle compared with an actual 10-degrees average decrease. Agreement for sagittal plane changes improved in five cases when the beams representing the motion segments were displaced posteriorly. In the sixth case (with the rod applied over a lordotic spinal region), agreement was improved with the motion segment beams displaced anteriorly. The amount of the beam displacement that gave the best agreement was variable, and we were not able to predict it for each individual. Both measured and simulated changes in vertebral transverse plane rotations and in rib angulations were small. The greatest source of errors in these simulations appeared to be inadequate representation of in vivo motion segment behavior by in vitro measured stiffness properties.
引用
收藏
页码:2457 / 2464
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aaro S., Dahlborn M., The effect of Harrington instrumentation on the longitudinal axis rotation of the apical vertebra and on the spinal and rib cage deformity in idiopathic scoliosis studied by computer tomography, Spine, 7, pp. 456-462, (1982)
[2]  
Aaro S., Ohlen G., The effect of Harrington instrumentation on the sagittal configuration and mobility of the spine in scoliosis, Spine, 8, pp. 570-574, (1983)
[3]  
Ashman R.B., Birch J.G., Bone L.B., Corin J.D., Herring J.A., Johnston C.E., Ritterbush J.F., Roach J.W., Mechanical testing of spinal instrumentation, Clin Orthop, 227, pp. 113-125, (1988)
[4]  
Bassett G.S., Hensinger B.S., Keiper M.D., Effect of posterior spinal fusion on spinal balance in idiopathic scoliosis, J Pediatr Orthop, 9, pp. 672-674, (1989)
[5]  
Benson D.R., Dewald R.L., Schultz A.B., Harrington rod detraction instrumentation. Its effect on vertebral rotation and thoracic compensation, Clin Orthop, 125, pp. 40-44, (1977)
[6]  
Casey M.P., Asher M.A., Jacobs R.R., Orrick J.M., The effect of Harrington rod contouring on lumbar lordosis, Spine, 12, pp. 750-753, (1987)
[7]  
Dansereau J., Stokes I., Measurements of the three- dimensional shape of the rib cage, J Biomech, 21, pp. 893-901, (1988)
[8]  
Dowell J.K., Powell J.M., Webb P.J., Morley T.R., Factors influencing the result of posterior spinal fusion in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Spine, 15, pp. 803-808, (1990)
[9]  
Fitch R.D., Turi M., Bowman Be Hardaker W.T., Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset and Harrington rod instrumentations in idiopathic scoliosis, J Pediatr Orthop, 10, pp. 44-47, (1990)
[10]  
Gaines R.W., McKinley C.M., Leatherman K.D., Effect of the Harrington compression system on the correction of the rib hump in spinal instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1981