Intrapartum care quality indicators: a literature review

被引:11
作者
Lazzaretto, Elisa [1 ]
Nespoli, Antonella [2 ]
Fumagalli, Simona [3 ]
Colciago, Elisabetta [4 ]
Perego, Sofia [2 ]
Locatelli, Anna [5 ]
机构
[1] ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Dept Matern, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, FBBM Monza, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Ctr Biostat Clin Epidemiol, Monza, Monza Brianza, Italy
[5] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Med & Surg, Unit Mother & Child, ASST Vimercate, Milan, Italy
来源
MINERVA GINECOLOGICA | 2018年 / 70卷 / 03期
关键词
Quality indicators; health care; Midwifery; Maternal-child nursing;
D O I
10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04177-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Quality of care is increasingly recognized as a critical aspect of the maternal and newborn health, mainly with respect to care around labor and delivery and in the immediate postnatal period. The aim of this review was to identify the recommended intrapartum care indicators in order to measure the quality of midwifery care. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A structured literature search was conducted in August 2017 incorporating English and Italian language studies from 1993 and onwards to identify published articles on quality standards of intrapartum care. Research was performed into the area of enquiry in electronic database (Medline, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Trip) and in relevant midwifery websites. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 369 quality indicators to measure the intrapartum care. Following a systematic process that allows to classify all indicators in domains and categories, we analyzed 268 outcome and process indicators specifically designated to monitor the intrapartum care in a low risk population. Through the identification of further exclusion criteria and semantic analogies we obtained 80 final quality indicators (39 outcome indicators and 41 process indicators). CONCLUSIONS: We identified 80 indicators that should be used to measure the quality of low risk intrapartum care. Although the majority of indicators we could monitor through hospital databases and the Italian Birth Register-CeDAP are outcome indicators, it is important to give attention also to process indicators that measure the activities performed and whether or not they are evidence-based. For a low risk population they could measure adherence with guidelines that promote and support the normality of the process.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 355
页数:10
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Clinical governance and standards in UK maternity care to improve quality and safety [J].
Arulkumaran, Sabaratnam .
MIDWIFERY, 2010, 26 (05) :485-487
[2]   Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care [J].
Blanc, Ann K. ;
Diaz, Claudia ;
McCarthy, Katharine J. ;
Berdichevsky, Karla .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
[3]   Assessing the validity of indicators of the quality of maternal and newborn health care in Kenya [J].
Blanc, Ann K. ;
Warren, Charlotte ;
McCarthy, Katharine J. ;
Kimani, James ;
Ndwiga, Charity ;
RamaRao, Saumya .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2016, 6 (01)
[4]   Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery [J].
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Roque, Marta ;
Beatriz Aller, Marta ;
Osorio, Dimelza ;
Foradada, Carles ;
Vives, Angels ;
Rigau, David .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
[5]   Monitoring healthcare quality in an obstetrics and gynaecology department using a CUSUM chart [J].
Boulkedid, R. ;
Sibony, O. ;
Bossu-Salvador, C. ;
Oury, J. F. ;
Alberti, C. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (10) :1225-1235
[6]   Quality Indicators for Continuous Monitoring to Improve Maternal and Infant Health in Maternity Departments: A Modified Delphi Survey of an International Multidisciplinary Panel [J].
Boulkedid, Rym ;
Sibony, Olivier ;
Goffinet, Francois ;
Fauconnier, Arnaud ;
Branger, Bernard ;
Alberti, Corinne .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04)
[7]   The Quality of Clinical Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare - A Strategy for Identifying 'Routine Care Signal Functions' [J].
Brenner, Stephan ;
De Allegri, Manuela ;
Gabrysch, Sabine ;
Chinkhumba, Jobiba ;
Sarker, Malabika ;
Muula, Adamson S. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04)
[8]   WHO principles of perinatal care: The essential antenatal, perinatal, and postpartum care course [J].
Chalmers, B ;
Mangiaterra, V ;
Porter, R .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2001, 28 (03) :202-207
[9]   Assessing effective care in normal labor: The Bologna score [J].
Chalmers, B ;
Porter, R .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2001, 28 (02) :79-83
[10]   Measuring quality of maternity care [J].
Collins, Katherine J. ;
Draycott, Timothy .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 29 (08) :1132-1138