Geostatistical approaches to refinement of digital elevation data

被引:5
|
作者
Zhang, Jingxiong [1 ]
Zhu, Tao [1 ]
Tang, Yunwei [2 ]
Zhang, Wangle [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Remote Sensing Informat Engn, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
refinement; elevation data; data support; variogram deconvolution; semantic differences;
D O I
10.1080/10095020.2014.985283
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Data refinement refers to the processes by which a dataset's resolution, in particular, the spatial one, is refined, and is thus synonymous to spatial downscaling. Spatial resolution indicates measurement scale and can be seen as an index for regular data support. As a type of change of scale, data refinement is useful for many scenarios where spatial scales of existing data, desired analyses, or specific applications need to be made commensurate and refined. As spatial data are related to certain data support, they can be conceived of as support-specific realizations of random fields, suggesting that multivariate geostatistics should be explored for refining datasets from their coarser-resolution versions to the finer-resolution ones. In this paper, geostatistical methods for downscaling are described, and were implemented using GTOPO30 data and sampled Shuttle Radar Topography Mission data at a site in northwest China, with the latter's majority grid cells used as surrogate reference data. It was found that proper structural modeling is important for achieving increased accuracy in data refinement; here, structural modeling can be done through proper decomposition of elevation fields into trends and residuals and thereafter. It was confirmed that effects of semantic differences on data refinement can be reduced through properly estimating and incorporating biases in local means.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 189
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] From digital elevation model data to terrain depiction data
    Helmetag, A
    Smietanski, G
    Baumgart, M
    Kubbat, W
    ENHANCED AND SYNTHETIC VISION 1999, 1999, 3691 : 116 - 124
  • [32] Determining yield monitoring system delay time with geostatistical and data segmentation approaches
    Chung, SO
    Sudduth, KA
    Drummond, ST
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 2002, 45 (04): : 915 - 926
  • [33] Improving forest soil carbon models using spatial data and geostatistical approaches
    Black, Kevin
    Creamer, Rachel E.
    Xenakis, Georgios
    Cook, Sally
    GEODERMA, 2014, 232 : 487 - 499
  • [34] Mesoscale spatial modelling of ozone immissions. An application of geostatistical methods using a digital elevation model
    Pauly, M
    Drueke, M
    GEFAHRSTOFFE REINHALTUNG DER LUFT, 1996, 56 (06): : 225 - 230
  • [35] Automatic Refinement to Efficient Data Structures: A Comparison of Two Approaches
    Peter Lammich
    Andreas Lochbihler
    Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2019, 63 : 53 - 94
  • [36] Automatic Refinement to Efficient Data Structures: A Comparison of Two Approaches
    Lammich, Peter
    Lochbihler, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 2019, 63 (01) : 53 - 94
  • [37] Geostatistical digital image merging
    Delgado-García, J
    Chica-Olmo, M
    Abarca-Hernández, F
    GEOENV IV - GEOSTATISTICS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS: PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 13 : 79 - 90
  • [38] Comparison of digital elevation models for aquatic data development
    Clarke, S
    Burnett, K
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 69 (12): : 1367 - 1375
  • [39] Distinguishing actual and artefact depressions in digital elevation data
    Lindsay, John B.
    Creed, Irena F.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2006, 32 (08) : 1192 - 1204
  • [40] ACCURACY OF EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS FROM DIGITAL ELEVATION DATA
    WONG, KW
    SIYAM, YM
    PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1983, 49 (01): : 103 - 109