PRENATAL COCAINE AND CELL-DEVELOPMENT IN RAT-BRAIN REGIONS - EFFECTS ON ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE AND MACROMOLECULES

被引:26
作者
SEIDLER, FJ
SLOTKIN, TA
机构
[1] Department of Pharmacology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham
关键词
BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; EFFECTS OF COCAINE; COCAINE; EFFECTS ON BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; DNA; ORNITHINE DECARBOXYLASE;
D O I
10.1016/0361-9230(93)90043-B
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Prenatal cocaine exposure has been shown to cause neurobehavioral abnormalities. To determine whether effects on basic patterns of cell development underlie these functional deficits, we examined the aftermath of acute and chronic cocaine exposure on ontogenetic patterns of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), a key regulator of cell replication/differentiation, DNA synthesis as monitored by [H-3]thymidine incorporation, and markers of cell number (DNA content) and cell size (protein/DNA ratio). Administration of 30 mg/kg SC of cocaine to pregnant rats on gestational day 20 resulted in acute increases of ODC throughout the brain. When the same dose of cocaine was given daily from gestational days 8 through 20, ODC elevations persisted into the neonatal period but disappeared by the middle of the first postnatal week. Although this treatment regimen retarded maternal weight gain, there was little or no effect on pup body or brain region weights. Similarly, minor changes in DNA synthesis were seen in two brain regions (forebrain, cerebellum), but DNA content was largely unaffected. Postnatal cell growth was significantly reduced in the forebrain, as-evidenced by deficits in protein/DNA but, again, the magnitude of effect was quite small. Raising the daily dose of cocaine to 100 mg/kg resulted in significant maternal mortality and fetal resorptions in surviving dams. Shortening the treatment regimen to a 3-day period (gestational days 18 through 20) eliminated the effects on maternal weight gain and on postnatal pup brain region ODC. These results suggest that prenatal exposure to cocaine does have adverse effects on biomarkers of cell development in fetal and neonatal brain, but that the outcomes are relatively minor when compared to those of other drugs, such as nicotine, that share some of the pharmacological features of cocaine, especially fetal hypoxia/ischemia. The functional deficits attributable to fetal cocaine exposure thus probably reflect actions directed toward specific cell or synaptic populations, as opposed to global effects on cell development.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 58 条
[12]   STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL-EFFECTS OF PRENATAL COCAINE EXPOSURE IN ADULT-RAT BRAIN [J].
DOWEDWARDS, DL ;
FREED, LA ;
FICO, TA .
DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1990, 57 (02) :263-268
[13]   STIMULATION OF BRAIN METABOLISM BY PERINATAL COCAINE EXPOSURE [J].
DOWEDWARDS, DL ;
FREED, LA ;
MILHORAT, TH .
DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1988, 42 (01) :137-141
[15]   DUAL CONTROL OF DNA-SYNTHESIS BY ALPHA-ADRENERGIC AND BETA-ADRENERGIC MECHANISMS IN NORMOXIC AND HYPOXIC NEONATAL RAT-BRAIN [J].
DUNCAN, CP ;
SEIDLER, FJ ;
LAPPI, SE ;
SLOTKIN, TA .
DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1990, 55 (01) :29-33
[16]   EFFECTS OF MK-801 ON DNA-SYNTHESIS IN NEONATAL RAT-BRAIN REGIONS UNDER NORMOXIC AND HYPOXIC CONDITIONS [J].
DUNCAN, CP ;
SEIDLER, FJ ;
SLOTKIN, TA .
DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 58 (01) :67-71
[17]   ROLE OF POLYAMINES IN THE CONTROL OF CELL-PROLIFERATION AND DIFFERENTIATION [J].
HEBY, O .
DIFFERENTIATION, 1981, 19 (01) :1-20
[18]   LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES OF PRENATAL EXPOSURE TO COCAINE OR RELATED DRUGS - EFFECTS ON RAT-BRAIN MONOAMINERGIC RECEPTORS [J].
HENDERSON, MG ;
MCCONNAUGHEY, MM ;
MCMILLEN, BA .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1991, 26 (06) :941-945
[19]   COCAINE TREATMENT IN NEONATAL RATS AFFECTS THE ADULT BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSE TO AMPHETAMINE [J].
HUGHES, HE ;
PRINGLE, GF ;
SCRIBANI, LA ;
DOWEDWARDS, DL .
NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 1991, 13 (03) :335-339
[20]   INUTERO COCAINE EXPOSURE - OBSERVATIONS OF FETAL BEHAVIORAL STATE MAY PREDICT NEONATAL OUTCOME [J].
HUME, RF ;
ODONNELL, KJ ;
STANGER, CL ;
KILLAM, AP ;
GINGRAS, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 161 (03) :685-690