Student Perceptions of the Instructor's Relational Characteristics, the Classroom Communication Experience, and the Interaction Involvement in Face-to-Face versus Video Conference Instruction

被引:18
作者
Umphrey, Laura R. [1 ]
Wickersham, Jeffrey A. [2 ]
Sherblom, John C. [3 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Commun, POB 5619, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT USA
[3] Univ Maine, Orono, ME USA
关键词
Classroom Experience; Face-to-face; Interactivity; Relational Characteristics; Video Conference;
D O I
10.1080/08824090802021954
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The present study examined student perceptions of the instructor's relational characteristics, classroom communication experience, and interaction involvement in courses taken face-to-face and in a video conference context. MANCOVA results showed significant differences between these contexts, with more negative student ratings of instructor immediacy and receptivity; classroom communication connectedness/mutuality, satisfaction, and quality; and interaction involvement occurring in the video conference classroom context than in the face-to-face context. A path analysis modeled the relationships among these perceptions of instructor characteristics, classroom communication experience, and interaction involvement. Based on this model, suggestions for improving student perceptions of the instructor, classroom communication, and interaction involvement in video conference courses are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 114
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
SMOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :596-612
[2]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[3]  
Bisciglia M. G., 2002, American Journal of Distance Education, V16, P37, DOI 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1601_4
[4]   SAMPLE-SIZE AND BENTLER AND BONETTS NONNORMED FIT INDEX [J].
BOLLEN, KA .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1986, 51 (03) :375-377
[5]   ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :230-258
[6]  
Burgoon JK, 2002, J COMMUN, V52, P657, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x
[7]   VALIDATION AND MEASUREMENT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL THEMES OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
HALE, JL .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1987, 54 (01) :19-41
[8]   THE FUNDAMENTAL TOPOI OF RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
HALE, JL .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1984, 51 (03) :193-214
[9]  
Carrell L. J., 2001, COMMUN EDUC, V50, P230, DOI DOI 10.1080/03634520109379250
[10]   AN ELABORATION OF THE MEANING OF INTERACTION INVOLVEMENT - TOWARD THE DEVELOPMENT OF A THEORETICAL CONCEPT [J].
CEGALA, DJ ;
SAVAGE, GT ;
BRUNNER, CC ;
CONRAD, AB .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1982, 49 (04) :229-248