Fundamentals of Clinical Outcomes Assessment for Spinal Disorders: Clinical Outcome Instruments and Applications

被引:25
作者
Vavken, Patrick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ganal-Antonio, Anne Kathleen B. [4 ]
Quidde, Julia [3 ]
Shen, Francis H. [5 ]
Chapman, Jens R. [6 ]
Samartzis, Dino [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Harvard Ctr Populat & Dev, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Basel, Dept Orthoped Surg, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Makati Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Makati, Philippines
[5] Univ Virginia, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
[6] Swedish Neurosci Inst, Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Hong Kong, Lab & Clin Res Inst Pain, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
spine; outcomes; instruments; questionnaires; personalized;
D O I
10.1055/s-0034-1396046
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design A broad narrative review. Objectives Outcome assessment in spinal disorders is imperative to help monitor the safety and efficacy of the treatment in an effort to change the clinical practice and improve patient outcomes. The following article, part two of a two-part series, discusses the various outcome tools and instruments utilized to address spinal disorders and their management. Methods A thorough review of the peer-reviewed literature was performed, irrespective of language, addressing outcome research, instruments and tools, and applications. Results Numerous articles addressing the development and implementation of health-related quality-of-life, neck and low back pain, overall pain, spinal deformity, and other condition-specific outcome instruments have been reported. Their applications in the context of the clinical trial studies, the economic analyses, and overall evidence-based orthopedics have been noted. Additional issues regarding the problems and potential sources of bias utilizing outcomes scales and the concept of minimally clinically important difference were discussed. Conclusion Continuing research needs to assess the outcome instruments and tools used in the clinical outcome assessment for spinal disorders. Understanding the fundamental principles in spinal outcome assessment may also advance the field of "personalized spine care."
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 338
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Aaronson N K, 1992, Qual Life Res, V1, P349, DOI 10.1007/BF00434949
[2]   The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis [J].
Asher, M ;
Lai, SM ;
Burton, D ;
Manna, B .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (01) :63-69
[3]   Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument [J].
Asher, MA ;
Lai, SM ;
Burton, DC .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (18) :2381-2386
[4]   The Scoliosis Research Society Health-Related Quality Of Life (SRS-30) Age-Gender Normative Data An Analysis of 1346 Adult Subjects Unaffected by Scoliosis [J].
Baldus, Christine ;
Bridwell, Keith ;
Harrast, John ;
Shaffrey, Christopher ;
Ondra, Stephen ;
Lenke, Lawrence ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Mardjetko, Steven ;
Glassman, Steven ;
Edwards, Charles, II ;
Lowe, Thomas ;
Horton, William ;
Polly, David, Jr. .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (14) :1154-1162
[5]   Studies in the modified scoliosis research society outcomes instrument in adults: Validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity [J].
Berven, S ;
Deviren, V ;
Demir-Deviren, S ;
Hu, SS ;
Bradford, DS .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (18) :2164-2169
[6]   Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it is not [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Giannoudis, PV .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (04) :302-306
[7]   Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? [J].
Bridwell, Keith H. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Glassman, Steven ;
Hamill, Christopher ;
Horton, William C., III ;
Lenke, Lawrence G. ;
Schwab, Frank ;
Baldus, Christine ;
Shainline, Michael .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (20) :2220-2225
[8]   Evaluating Common Outcomes for Measuring Treatment Success for Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Chapman, Jens R. ;
Norvell, Daniel C. ;
Hermsmeyer, Jeffrey T. ;
Bransford, Richard J. ;
DeVine, John ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Lee, Michael J. .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) :S54-S68
[9]   Internal Construct Validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire Rasch Analysis of a Disease-Specific Outcome Measure for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Comer, Christine M. ;
Conaghan, Philip G. ;
Tennant, Alan .
SPINE, 2011, 36 (23) :1969-1976
[10]   Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Berven, Sigurd ;
Schuler, Thomas C. ;
Carreon, Leah Y. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) :968-974