Peace, Violence, and Simulation/Gaming

被引:3
作者
Crookall, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
关键词
Arthur Koestler; belonging; collective violence; conflict; debriefing; emotions; holon; individual violence; ingroups; institutional violence; integrative tendency; integrative violence; intergroup relations; obedience to authority; origins of violence; outgroups; peace; peacebuilding; self-assertive tendency; self-assertive violence; simulation design; social identity theory; violence;
D O I
10.1177/1046878113479009
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
I characterize violence as falling into two types, using Arthur Koestler's two tendencies: integrative and self-assertive. It is the integrative tendency, the belief in a cause and the abrogation of one's identity and obedience to a higher authority, that leads to integrative violence and wars. The principal cause of violence is not individual aggressiveness, but submission to ingroup, cause, ideology, or country. Simulation/games and debriefing protocols need to take into account a wide spectrum of research on the springs of violence if they are to promote durable peace.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 26
页数:20
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The humanistic psychology of human evil: Ernest Becker and Arthur Koestler [J].
Bartlett, Steven James .
JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 48 (03) :340-363
[2]  
Becker E, 1969, ANGEL ARMOR POST FRE
[3]  
Borenstein S, 2011, HUFFINGTON POST
[4]  
Brynen R, PAXSIMS SIMULATIONS
[5]  
Chomsky N, 1967, LEGITIMACY VIOLENCE
[6]  
Chomsky N, SPARROW TALKS NOAM C
[7]  
CROOKALL D, 1989, COMMUNICATION SIMULA
[8]  
Crookall-Greening G, 2011, LABOURING PEACE HIST
[9]  
Durbin E.F.M, 1938, WAR AND DEMOCRACY
[10]   WAR, SOCIALIZATION, AND INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE - A CROSS-CULTURAL-STUDY [J].
EMBER, CR ;
EMBER, M .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1994, 38 (04) :620-646