The Corsican Batholith provides an opportunity to test the single-zircon evaporation technique developed by B. Kober for Hercynian times, In this paper we attempt to clarify the method of calculating Pb-207*/Pb-206* ages and errors. The significance of the pb-207*/Pb-206 ages are discussed with particular reference to the determination of the crystallization age of plutons. Zircon morphology is clearly an important criterion in selecting grains for analysis. Geological relations in the example that we are using are firmly established, enabling discussion of the Pb-207*/Pb-206* model age in the light of previous age determinations using other methods (Rb-Sr, 40Ar/39Ar and conventional U-Pb). We interpret the well-defined 322 +/- 12-Ma Pb-207*/Pb-206* age as the time of the crystallization of the U1, Mg-K rocks. This is in good agreement with Rb-Sr ages of the younger units U2a and U2b (312 +/- 9 and 290 +/- 6 Ma, respectively). Lead model ages on single-zircon crystals can be very precise and can give geologically more meaningful ages than those given by other methods, including the bulk-fraction conventional U-Pb method. The problem of episodic loss of radiogenic Pb can be avoided, making the grain concordant, and inherited grains or cores are easily detected. The Corsican Batholith provides an opportunity to test the single-zircon evaporation technique developed by B. Kober for Hercynian times, In this paper we attempt to clarify the method of calculating Pb-207*/Pb-206* ages and errors. The significance of the pb-207*/Pb-206 ages are discussed with particular reference to the determination of the crystallization age of plutons. Zircon morphology is clearly an important criterion in selecting grains for analysis. Geological relations in the example that we are using are firmly established, enabling discussion of the Pb-207*/Pb-206* model age in the light of previous age determinations using other methods (Rb-Sr, 40Ar/39Ar and conventional U-Pb). We interpret the well-defined 322 +/- 12-Ma Pb-207*/Pb-206* age as the time of the crystallization of the U1, Mg-K rocks. This is in good agreement with Rb-Sr ages of the younger units U2a and U2b (312 +/- 9 and 290 +/- 6 Ma, respectively). Lead model ages on single-zircon crystals can be very precise and can give geologically more meaningful ages than those given by other methods, including the bulk-fraction conventional U-Pb method. The problem of episodic loss of radiogenic Pb can be avoided, making the grain concordant, and inherited grains or cores are easily detected. The Corsican Batholith provides an opportunity to test the single-zircon evaporation technique developed by B. Kober for Hercynian times, In this paper we attempt to clarify the method of calculating Pb-207*/Pb-206* ages and errors. The significance of the pb-207*/Pb-206 ages are discussed with particular reference to the determination of the crystallization age of plutons. Zircon morphology is clearly an important criterion in selecting grains for analysis. Geological relations in the example that we are using are firmly established, enabling discussion of the Pb-207*/Pb-206* model age in the light of previous age determinations using other methods (Rb-Sr, 40Ar/39Ar and conventional U-Pb). We interpret the well-defined 322 +/- 12-Ma Pb-207*/Pb-206* age as the time of the crystallization of the U1, Mg-K rocks. This is in good agreement with Rb-Sr ages of the younger units U2a and U2b (312 +/- 9 and 290 +/- 6 Ma, respectively). Lead model ages on single-zircon crystals can be very precise and can give geologically more meaningful ages than those given by other methods, including the bulk-fraction conventional U-Pb method. The problem of episodic loss of radiogenic Pb can be avoided, making the grain concordant, and inherited grains or cores are easily detected.
