Efficiency of Performing Pulmonary Procedures in a Shared Endoscopy Unit Procedure Time, Turnaround Time, Delays, and Procedure Waiting Time

被引:2
作者
Verma, Akash [1 ]
Lee, Mui Yok [1 ]
Wang, Chunhong [1 ]
Hussein, Nurmalah B. M. [1 ]
Selvi, Kalai [1 ]
Tee, Augustine [1 ]
机构
[1] Changi Gen Hosp, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore 529889, Singapore
关键词
bronchoscopy; efficiency; endoscopy; medical thoracoscopy; theory of constraint; bottleneck; endobronchial ultrasound;
D O I
10.1097/LBR.0000000000000050
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency of performing pulmonary procedures in the endoscopy unit in a large teaching hospital. Methods: A prospective study from May 20 to July 19, 2013, was designed. The main outcome measures were procedure delays and their reasons, duration of procedural steps starting from patient's arrival to endoscopy unit, turnaround time, total case durations, and procedure wait time. Results: A total of 65 procedures were observed. The most common procedure was BAL (61%) followed by TBLB (31%). Overall procedures for 35 (53.8%) of 65 patients were delayed by >= 30 minutes, 21/35 (60%) because of "spillover" of the gastrointestinal and surgical cases into the time block of pulmonary procedure. Time elapsed between end of pulmonary procedure and start of the next procedure was >= 30 minutes in 8/51 (16%) of cases. In 18/51 (35%) patients there was no next case in the room after completion of the pulmonary procedure. The average idle time of the room after the end of pulmonary procedure and start of next case or end of shift at 5: 00 PM if no next case was 58 +/- 53 minutes. In 17/51 (33%) patients the room's idle time was > 60 minutes. A total of 52.3% of patients had the wait time > 2 days and 11% had it >= 6 days, reason in 15/21 (71%) being unavailability of the slot. Conclusions: Most pulmonary procedures were delayed due to spillover of the gastrointestinal and surgical cases into the block time allocated to pulmonary procedures. The most common reason for difficulty encountered in scheduling the pulmonary procedure was slot unavailability. This caused increased procedure waiting time. The strategies to reduce procedure delays and turnaround times, along with improved scheduling methods, may have a favorable impact on the volume of procedures performed in the unit thereby optimizing the existing resources.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Epidemiology of lung cancer - ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)
    Alberg, Anthony J.
    Ford, Jean G.
    Samet, Jonathan M.
    [J]. CHEST, 2007, 132 (03) : 29S - 55S
  • [2] The European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit:: a prospective study
    Balaguer, F
    Llach, J
    Castells, A
    Bordas, JM
    Pellisé, M
    Rodríguez-Moranta, F
    Mata, A
    Fernández-Esparrach, G
    Ginès, A
    Piqué, JM
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (05) : 609 - 613
  • [3] Strategies to Address Increased Demand for Colonoscopy: Guidelines in an Open Endoscopy Practice
    Baron, Todd H.
    Kimery, Brenda D.
    Sorbi, Darius
    Gorkis, Linda C.
    Leighton, Jonathan A.
    Fleischer, David E.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 2 (02) : 178 - 182
  • [4] Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe Asthma A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Castro, Mario
    Rubin, Adalberto S.
    Laviolette, Michel
    Fiterman, Jussara
    Lima, Marina De Andrade
    Shah, Pallav L.
    Fiss, Elie
    Olivenstein, Ronald
    Thomson, Neil C.
    Niven, Robert M.
    Pavord, Ian D.
    Simoff, Michael
    Duhamel, David R.
    McEvoy, Charlene
    Barbers, Richard
    ten Hacken, Nicolaas H. T.
    Wechsler, Michael E.
    Holmes, Mark
    Phillips, Martin J.
    Erzurum, Serpil
    Lunn, William
    Israel, Elliot
    Jariour, Nizar
    Kraft, Monica
    Shargill, Narinder S.
    Quiring, John
    Berry, Scott M.
    Cox, Gerard
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 181 (02) : 116 - 124
  • [5] COX J, 1986, GOAL PROCESS ONGOING
  • [6] Cutler AF, 2007, ENDOSCOPY, P83
  • [7] Ernst A, 2011, PULM MED, V2011, P1
  • [8] Managing and avoiding delay in operating theatres: a qualitative, observational study
    Higgins, Vaughan J. G.
    Bryant, Melanie J.
    Villanueva, Elmer V.
    Kitto, Simon C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (01) : 162 - 166
  • [9] Ikeda S., 1971, JPN J CLIN ONCOL, V1, P55
  • [10] Kim J, 2012, BRIT J ANAESTH, V108, P310