EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CROPPING SYSTEMS ON SOIL-WATER PROPERTIES OF A BORALF SOIL

被引:18
|
作者
BROERSMA, K [1 ]
ROBERTSON, JA [1 ]
CHANASYK, DS [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ALBERTA,DEPT SOIL SCI,EDMONTON,AB T6G 2E3,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00103629509369409
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A long-term field experiment utilizing five different cropping systems was established on a Boralf soil in 1968 in the Peace River region of Alberta, Canada. The cropping systems consisted of: continuous barley (CB), barley/forage (Bf) (3 y of barley followed by 3 y of forage), forage/barley (Fb) (3 y of forage followed by 3 y of barley), continuous grass (CG) as bromegrass and continuous legume (CL) as red clover. The saturated conductivity (K-sat) was improved by growing forage crops as the CG acid CL cropping systems had a higher K-sat (1.20x10(-2) and 1.57x10(-2) cm h(-1)) than the Fb, Bf, and CB cropping systems (4.41x10(-3), 5.01x10(-3) and 4.50x10(-4) cm hr(-1), respectively) for the 15-30 cm depth. At the 30-45 cm depth the CL cropping system K-sat was a hundred fold greater, at 10(-2) compared to 10(-4) cm hr(-1). The infiltration and the depth of accumulated water over time also reflected forage production cropping practices as the CG and CL cropping systems had the highest infiltration rates at 30 min of 9.7 and 9.4 mm hr(-1) while the Fb, Bf, and CB cropping systems had infiltration rates of 4.8, 7.1 and 8.3 mm hr(-1). The ratio of the infiltration rate at the beginning versus the end of the infiltration period (30 to 480 min) of 4.0, 5.6, 6.4, 6.4; and 7.0 although not significant indicated decreasing structural stability in the order of CG > CL > Bf > Fb > CB cropping systems, respectively. It was observed that differences in soil water properties due to cropping history were reflected.
引用
收藏
页码:1795 / 1811
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] EVALUATING SOIL MAPS FOR PREDICTION OF SOIL-WATER PROPERTIES
    LEENHARDT, D
    VOLTZ, M
    BORNAND, M
    WEBSTER, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1994, 45 (03) : 293 - 301
  • [12] Effects of soil-water interaction on the flow in soil fissure
    Wang, Yuping
    Wang, Yonghong
    Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999, 18 (05): : 554 - 557
  • [13] SOIL STRUCTURE, SOIL HYDRAULIC-PROPERTIES AND THE SOIL-WATER BALANCE
    CRESSWELL, HP
    SMILES, DE
    WILLIAMS, J
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1992, 30 (03): : 265 - 283
  • [14] VARIABILITY OF SOIL-WATER TENSION AND SOIL-WATER CONTENT
    HENDRICKX, JMH
    WIERENGA, PJ
    NASH, MS
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1990, 18 (02) : 135 - 148
  • [15] SOIL-WATER UNDER CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE CROPPING SYSTEMS IN CRYOBOREAL SUBHUMID CENTRAL ALBERTA
    IZAURRALDE, RC
    CHANASYK, DS
    JUMA, NG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1994, 74 (01) : 85 - 92
  • [16] Soil-water and soil physical properties under contour hedgerow systems on sloping oxisols
    Agus, F
    Cassel, DK
    Garrity, DP
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (3-4): : 185 - 199
  • [17] Effects of agricultural management on surface soil properties and soil-water losses in eastern Spain
    Garcia-Orenes, F.
    Cerda, A.
    Mataix-Solera, J.
    Guerrero, C.
    Bodi, M. B.
    Arcenegui, V.
    Zornoza, R.
    Sempere, J. G.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2009, 106 (01): : 117 - 123
  • [18] OSMOTIC POTENTIAL OF SOIL-WATER IN PLANT-SOIL SYSTEMS
    SANDS, R
    REID, CPP
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1980, 18 (01): : 13 - 25
  • [19] Effects of four soil surfactants on four soil-water properties in sand and silt loam
    Mobbs, T. L.
    Peters, R. T.
    Davenport, J. R.
    Evans, M. A.
    Wu, J. Q.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2012, 67 (04) : 275 - 283
  • [20] PREDICTIONS OF SOIL-WATER FLUX BASED UPON FIELD-MEASURED SOIL-WATER PROPERTIES
    WARRICK, AW
    MULLEN, GJ
    NIELSEN, DR
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (01) : 14 - 19