Public Discussion and Deliberation in Multicultural Societies

被引:0
作者
Marchettoni, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Firenze, Jura Gentium Ctr Philosophy Int Law & Global Poli, Dipartimento Sci Giurid, Via Pandette 32, I-50127 Florence, Italy
来源
POLITICA & SOCIETA | 2013年 / 2卷 / 02期
关键词
multiculturalism; democracy; deliberation; Robert Brandom; inferentialism;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
My aim in this paper is to compare traditional multiculturalist political theory with a new paradigm in which the usual strategies for dealing with cultural diversities are replaced by the tools provided by inferential semantics as developed by Robert Brandom. The upshot is the transition from a landscape which is highly demanding with respect to the common assumptions among different views of the world to a dialogical context in which contrasting beliefs can come into light more freely.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 309
页数:21
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Amselle J.L., 2001, BRANCHEMENTS ANTHR U
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, POLITICAL LIBERALISM
[3]  
Appadurai A., 1996, MODERNITY LARGE
[4]   Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities [J].
Baechtiger, Andre ;
Niemeyer, Simon ;
Neblo, Michael ;
Steenbergen, Marco R. ;
Steiner, Juerg .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, 2010, 18 (01) :32-63
[5]  
Benhabib S., 2006, ANOTHER COSMOPOLITAN, P13
[6]  
BENHABIB S, 2002, CLAIMS CULTURE EQUAL, P106
[7]  
Bohman J., 2000, PUBLIC DELIBERATION, P85
[8]  
Brandom R. B., 2000, ARTICULATING REASONS
[9]  
Brandom Robert, 1994, MAKING IT EXPLICIT R
[10]  
Brandom Robert, 2002, ARTICOLARE RAGIONI