A Unified Smart City Model (USCM) for Smart City Conceptualization and Benchmarking

被引:76
作者
Anthopoulos, Leonidas [1 ]
Janssen, Marijn [2 ]
Weerakkody, Vishanth [3 ]
机构
[1] TEI Thessaly, Sch Business, Larisa, Greece
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Brunel Univ London, Brunel Business Sch, Uxbridge, Middx, England
关键词
Architectures; Benchmarking; E-Government; Frameworks; Measurement; Modeling; Smart City;
D O I
10.4018/IJEGR.2016040105
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Smart cities have attracted an extensive and emerging interest from both science and industry with an increasing number of international examples emerging from all over the world. However, despite the significant role that smart cities can play to deal with recent urban challenges, the concept has been being criticized for not being able to realize its potential and for being a vendor hype. This paper reviews different conceptualization, benchmarks and evaluations of the smart city concept. Eight different classes of smart city conceptualization models have been discovered, which structure the unified conceptualization model and concern smart city facilities (i.e., energy, water, IoT etc.), services (i.e., health, education etc.), governance, planning and management, architecture, data and people. Benchmarking though is still ambiguous and different perspectives are followed by the researchers that measure - and recently monitor-various factors, which somehow exceed typical technological or urban characteristics. This can be attributed to the broadness of the smart city concept. This paper sheds light to parameters that can be measured and controlled in an attempt to improve smart city potential and leaves space for corresponding future research. More specifically, smart city progress, local capacity, vulnerabilities for resilience and policy impact are only some of the variants that scholars pay attention to measure and control.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 93
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]  
International Standards Organization (ISO), 2014, SMART CIT PREL REP 2
[32]  
ITU, 2014, OV KEY PERF IND SMAR
[33]  
ITU (International Telecommunication Union), 2014, SMART SUST CIT AN DE
[34]   Measuring the impact of urban policies on transportation energy saving using a land use-transport model [J].
Kii, Masanobu ;
Akimoto, Keigo ;
Doi, Kenji .
IATSS RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (02) :98-109
[35]  
Kourtit K., 2012, INNOVATION EUROPEAN, V25, P229
[36]   A multi-actor multi-criteria analysis of the performance of global cities [J].
Kourtit, Katima ;
Macharis, Cathy ;
Nijkamp, Peter .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 49 :24-36
[37]   Definition methodology for the smart cities model [J].
Lazaroiu, George Cristian ;
Roscia, Mariacristina .
ENERGY, 2012, 47 (01) :326-332
[38]   Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco [J].
Lee, Jung Hoon ;
Hancock, Marguerite Gong ;
Hu, Mei-Chih .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 89 :80-99
[39]   An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development [J].
Lee, Jung Hoon ;
Phaal, Robert ;
Lee, Sang-Ho .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (02) :286-306
[40]   The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective [J].
Leydesdorff, Loet ;
Deakin, Mark .
JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :53-63