Urinary continence four weeks following Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy: The UK experience

被引:24
作者
Eden, Christopher G. [1 ]
Moschonas, Dimitrios [1 ]
Soares, Ricardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, Dept Urol, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
Prostate cancer; robotic surgery; Retzius-sparing prostatectomy; radical prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1177/2051415817706635
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate urinary continence four weeks following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Patients and methods: Forty patients with T2-T3 prostate cancer underwent Retzius-sparing-robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and their results were compared with those from the 40 patients having robot-assisted radical prostatectomy done by the same surgeon immediately prior to the adoption of Retzius-sparing-robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Results: Patients in the two groups had similar age, body mass index, prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason sum, clinical stage, d'Amico risk profile, blood loss, prostate weight and post-operative hospital stay. Median operating time (200 (interquartile range=155-266) vs 223 (interquartile range=100-238) min; p=0.05) and catheterisation (8 (interquartile range=8-8) vs 14 (interquartile range=14-14) days; p<0.0001) were shorter in the Retzius-sparing group, many of whom had suprapubic catheters inserted. The overall complication rate was lower in Retzius-sparing patients (2.5% vs 8.0%; p=0.36). Positive surgical margin rates were similar for Retzius-sparing and non-Retzius-sparing patients and decreased with greater experience with the Retzius-sparing technique: 16.7% vs 7.7% for pT2 (p=0.65) and 31.8% vs 14.3% for pT3 (p=0.44). Initial prostate specific antigen was <0.1 ng/ml in 97.5% and 100%, respectively (p=1.00). At four weeks post-operation 0, 1 and 2 pads/day were needed in the Retzius-sparing group in 90.0%, 7.5% and 2.5% of patients, compared to 37.5% (p<0.0001), 32.5% (p=0.01) and 30% (p=0.002) of men having conventional surgery. Conclusion: Retzius-sparing-robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is faster than the anterior approach to the prostate, allows a shorter catheterisation time and produces dramatically better continence results at four weeks with 90% of patients being pad-free and 97.5% of patients needing 0-1 pads/day.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 20
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Critical appraisal of the anatomic landmarks for a complete intrafascial approach [J].
Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D. ;
Miano, Roberto ;
Galfano, Antonio ;
Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo ;
Vespasiani, Giuseppe ;
Spera, Enrico ;
Gaston, Richard .
CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2015, 28 (07) :896-902
[2]   Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Rider, Jennifer R. ;
Taari, Kimmo ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Andren, Ove ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Steineck, Gunnar ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (10) :932-942
[3]   Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes [J].
Coelho, Rafael F. ;
Chauhan, Sanket ;
Palmer, Kenneth J. ;
Rocco, Bernardo ;
Patel, Manoj B. ;
Patel, Vipul R. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (10) :1428-1435
[4]  
Davidson PJT, 1996, EUR UROL, V29, P168
[5]   Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: Time for a change [J].
Donat, Sherri Machele .
UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (02) :221-225
[6]   PATIENT-REPORTED COMPLICATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - THE NATIONAL MEDICARE EXPERIENCE - 1988-1990 (UPDATED JUNE 1993) [J].
FOWLER, FJ ;
BARRY, MJ ;
LUYAO, G ;
ROMAN, A ;
WASSON, J ;
WENNBERG, JE .
UROLOGY, 1993, 42 (06) :622-629
[7]   Beyond the Learning Curve of the Retzius-sparing Approach for Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncologic and Functional Results of the First 200 Patients with ≥1 Year of Follow-up [J].
Galfano, Antonio ;
Di Trapani, Dario ;
Sozzi, Francesco ;
Strada, Elena ;
Petralia, Giovanni ;
Bramerio, Manuela ;
Ascione, Assunta ;
Gambacorta, Marcello ;
Bocciardi, Aldo Massimo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (06) :974-980
[8]   Anterior suspension combined with posterior reconstruction during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy improves early return of urinary continence: a prospective randomized multicentre trial [J].
Hurtes, Xavier ;
Roupret, Morgan ;
Vaessen, Christophe ;
Pereira, Helder ;
d'Arcier, Benjamin Faivre ;
Cormier, Luc ;
Bruyere, Franck .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (06) :875-883
[9]   Impact of Percutaneous Suprapubic Tube Drainage on Patient Discomfort after Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Krane, Louis Spencer ;
Bhandari, Mahendra ;
Peabody, James O. ;
Menon, Mani .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (02) :325-330
[10]   Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches [J].
Lim, Sey Kiat ;
Kim, Kwang Hyun ;
Shin, Tae-Young ;
Han, Woong Kyu ;
Chung, Byung Ha ;
Hong, Sung Joon ;
Choi, Young Deuk ;
Rha, Koon Ho .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (02) :236-244