A Framework for Navigating Institutional Review Board (IRB) Oversight in the Complicated Zone of Research

被引:3
|
作者
Parker, Gretchen E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pearl IRB LLC, Eth Review, Indianapolis, IN 46225 USA
来源
CUREUS | 2016年 / 8卷 / 10期
关键词
institutional review board; clinical research; efficiency; ethics committee; biomedical research; human subjects research; research ethics;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.844
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The treatment therapies and technologies currently emerging from the rapidly evolving health care industry must undergo full examination in a clinical setting if they are to be marketed to the public. All elements of clinical studies involving human subjects must undergo thorough IRB review before study activities can commence. Regulations regarding IRB oversight apply to all clinical studies-including retrospective examinations of private medical data and identifiable biological samples. It is not uncommon for researchers to be unsure whether, or on what level, IRB review and oversight are required for a particular project. Yet, if human subjects or their private medical data are utilized in a study, peer-reviewed journals will require relevant IRB approval information be provided as a requirement for publication. This article examines IRB processes and review types, offers insight into the IRB decision-making process, and emphasizes the importance of engaging an IRB consultant early in the clinical study design process.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] Variation in institutional review board - Responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol
    Mansbach, Jonathan
    Acholonu, Uchechi
    Clark, Sunday
    Camargo, Carlos A., Jr.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (04) : 377 - 380
  • [32] An Institutional Review Board-Based Clinical Research Quality Assurance Program
    Lad, Pramod M.
    Dahl, Rebecca
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2013, 20 (01): : 13 - 26
  • [33] IRB Decision-Making with Imperfect Knowledge: A Framework for Evidence-Based Research Ethics Review
    Anderson, Emily E.
    DuBois, James M.
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2012, 40 (04) : 951 - 969
  • [34] Applications for Research Concerning Fetal or Placental Tissue and Expected Institutional Review Board Responses
    Borgatta, Lynn
    Kaufman, David
    Kelly, Judith Parsells
    Babaian, David
    Banks, Mary
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2017, 12 (03) : 150 - 160
  • [35] A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices
    Kraft, Stephanie Alessi
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Constantine, Melissa
    Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin
    Kelley, Maureen
    Korngiebel, Diane
    James, Cyan
    Kuwana, Ellen
    Meyer, Adrienne
    Porter, Kathryn
    Diekema, Douglas
    Capron, Alexander M.
    Alicic, Radica
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Magnus, David
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 13 (05) : 555 - 565
  • [36] Systems approach to assessing and improving local human research Institutional Review Board performance
    Fontanesi, John
    Magit, Anthony
    Ford, Jennifer J.
    Nguyen, Han
    Firestein, Gary S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2018, 2 (02) : 103 - 109
  • [37] Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance
    Vardeny, Orly
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Cohen, Lauren W.
    Franklin, Amy
    Baqai, Mina
    Palmer, Sarah
    Bierer, Barbara E.
    Cobb, Nichelle
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 16 (03) : 290 - 296
  • [38] Risk in emergency research using a waiver of/exception from consent: Implications of a structured approach for institutional review board review
    McRae, AD
    Ackroyd-Stolarz, S
    Weijer, C
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (11) : 1104 - 1112
  • [39] Ethical Challenges in COVID-19 Biospecimen Research: Perspectives From Institutional Review Board Members and Bioethicists
    Lapid, Maria I.
    Meagher, Karen M.
    Giunta, Hannah C.
    Clarke, Bart L.
    Ouellette, Yves
    Armbrust, Tamyra L.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    Wright, R. Scott
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 96 (01) : 165 - 173
  • [40] Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation: What Every Clinical Investigator Should Know About the Institutional Review Board
    Rivera, Suzanne M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 56 (08) : 975 - 984