A Framework for Navigating Institutional Review Board (IRB) Oversight in the Complicated Zone of Research

被引:3
|
作者
Parker, Gretchen E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pearl IRB LLC, Eth Review, Indianapolis, IN 46225 USA
来源
CUREUS | 2016年 / 8卷 / 10期
关键词
institutional review board; clinical research; efficiency; ethics committee; biomedical research; human subjects research; research ethics;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.844
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The treatment therapies and technologies currently emerging from the rapidly evolving health care industry must undergo full examination in a clinical setting if they are to be marketed to the public. All elements of clinical studies involving human subjects must undergo thorough IRB review before study activities can commence. Regulations regarding IRB oversight apply to all clinical studies-including retrospective examinations of private medical data and identifiable biological samples. It is not uncommon for researchers to be unsure whether, or on what level, IRB review and oversight are required for a particular project. Yet, if human subjects or their private medical data are utilized in a study, peer-reviewed journals will require relevant IRB approval information be provided as a requirement for publication. This article examines IRB processes and review types, offers insight into the IRB decision-making process, and emphasizes the importance of engaging an IRB consultant early in the clinical study design process.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] Defining institutional review board application quality: critical research gaps and future opportunities
    Serpico, Kimberley
    RESEARCH ETHICS, 2023, : 19 - 35
  • [22] Institutional review board perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants
    Gliwa, Catherine
    Yurkiewicz, Ilana R.
    Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani
    Hull, Sara Chandros
    Jones, Nathan
    Berkman, Benjamin E.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (07) : 705 - 711
  • [23] Institutional Review Board review and consent for research: What's behind the statistics?
    Danis, M
    Grady, C
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (09) : 1488 - 1489
  • [24] Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research
    Hirshon, JM
    Krugman, SD
    Witting, MD
    Furuno, JP
    Limcangco, MR
    Perisse, AR
    Rasch, EK
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 9 (12) : 1417 - 1420
  • [25] Approaches to Facilitate Institutional Review Board Approval of Multicenter Research Studies
    Marsolo, Keith
    MEDICAL CARE, 2012, 50 (07) : S77 - S81
  • [26] How to Do Human-Subjects Research If You Do Not Have an Institutional Review Board
    Rice, Todd W.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2008, 53 (10) : 1362 - 1367
  • [27] While ethical considerations predominate, scientific merit can impact Institutional Review Board (IRB) determinations: a cross-sectional study
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Harikumar, Vishnu B.
    Poon, Emily
    West, Dennis P.
    Alam, Murad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 150 : 12 - 17
  • [28] Surrogate consent for research involving adults with impaired decision making: Survey of Institutional Review Board practices
    Gong, Michelle Ng
    Winkel, Gary
    Rhodes, Rosamond
    Richardson, Lynne D.
    Silverstein, Jeffrey H.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (11) : 2146 - 2154
  • [29] INFORMED CONSENT AND INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL IN MEXICAN MEDICAL-RESEARCH
    LOPEZDELAPENA, XA
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 1995, 47 (05): : 399 - 404
  • [30] Mock Institutional Review Board: Promoting Analytical and Reasoning Skills in Research Ethics
    Dols, Jean Dowling
    Hoke, Mary M.
    Rauschhuber, Maureen L.
    NURSE EDUCATOR, 2017, 42 (06) : E4 - E8