Evaluation of the Use of a Stabilization Device to Improve the Quality of Care in Patients With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

被引:18
作者
Waterhouse, Jennifer [1 ,2 ]
Bandisode, Varsha [3 ,4 ]
Brandon, Debra [5 ]
Olson, Meredith [6 ]
Docherty, Sharron L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Surg, 165 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Pediat Surg, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Pediat, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[4] Med Univ South Carolina, Div Pediat Cardiol, Pediat Cardiac Cath Lab, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC USA
[6] Med Univ South Carolina, Pediat Cardiol Dept, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
cardiac; catheter securement; pediatrics; peripherally inserted central catheters;
D O I
10.1097/NCI.0000000000000026
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objectives: This project evaluated the implementation of use of the StatLock stabilization device (Bard Access Systems, Inc, Salt Lake City, Utah) for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in pediatric cardiology patients. The aim was to implement the use of the StatLock device and evaluate its effects on the following 4 outcomes: incidence of dislodgement, infection, catheter dwell time, and the number of catheter replacements. The primary goal was to determine whether the StatLock device offered advantages over tape and sutures. Methods: A quality improvement design was used to evaluate whether the use of the StatLock stabilization device for PICC securement on 30 pediatric cardiology patients decreased the number of PICC complications compared with 30 historical comparison patients. Results: The comparison group had a significantly higher number of catheter dislodgements (n = 16; 59.3%) than the StatLock group (n = 8; 30.8%; P = .035). The comparison group did not have a significantly higher number of catheter replacements (n = 16; 59.3%) than the StatLock group (n = 10; 34.5%; P = .10). No significant differences were found in the rate of infection or in the catheter dwell time between the 2 groups (StatLock group, mean +/- SD = 33.13 +/- 22.71 days; comparison group, mean +/- SD = 28.10 +/- 24.83 days; P > .20). Conclusions: Use of the StatLock device resulted in better outcomes when compared with the use of sutures, and it provided a more effective way to stabilize and secure PICCs.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 220
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, GUIDELINES PREVENTIO
[2]   Evaluation of peripherally inserted central catheters in a pediatric population [J].
Baudin, G. ;
Occelli, A. ;
Boyer, C. ;
Geoffray, A. ;
Chevallier, P. .
ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2013, 20 (10) :1089-1095
[3]   A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Complications of 2 Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-Stabilization Systems [J].
Bausone-Gazda, Dawn ;
Lefaiver, Cheryl A. ;
Walters, Shelley-Ann .
JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2010, 33 (06) :371-384
[4]  
Cantrell S, 2006, INFECT CONNECT, V10, P70
[5]   A prospective survey on incidence and outcome of Broviac/Hickman catheter-related complications in pediatric patients affected by hematological and oncological diseases [J].
Cesaro, S ;
Corrò, R ;
Pelosin, A ;
Gamba, P ;
Zadra, N ;
Fusaro, F ;
Pillon, M ;
Cusinato, R ;
Zampieri, C ;
Magagna, L ;
Cavaliere, M ;
Tridello, G ;
Zanon, G ;
Zanesco, L .
ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2004, 83 (03) :183-188
[6]   Prevention, Assessment, and Treatment of Central Venous Catheter Occlusions in Neonatal and Young Pediatric Patients [J].
Doellman, Darcy .
JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2011, 34 (04) :251-258
[7]   Central venous catheter-related complications in children with oncological/hematological diseases: an observational study of 418 devices [J].
Fratino, G ;
Molinari, AC ;
Parodi, S ;
Long, S ;
Saracco, P ;
Castagnola, E ;
Haupt, R .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (04) :648-654
[8]   Why Are We Stuck on Tape and Suture? A Review of Catheter Securement Devices [J].
Frey, Anne Marie ;
Schears, Gregory J. .
JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2006, 29 (01) :34-38
[9]  
Gabriel Janice, 2010, Nurs Stand, V24, P41
[10]  
Kline A., 2005, AACN CLIN ISSUES, P185