5 by 5 Microstrip Antenna Array Design by Multiobjective Differential Evolution based on Fuzzy Performance Feedback

被引:2
作者
Jariyatantiwait, Chatkaew [1 ]
Yen, Gary G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
Fuzzy Logic; Hypervolume; Maximum Spread; Multiobjective Differential Evolution; Performance Metrics; Spacing;
D O I
10.4018/IJSIR.2016100101
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Differential evolution is often regarded as one of the most efficient evolutionary algorithms to tackle multiobjective optimization problems. The key to success of any multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) is maintaining a delicate balance between exploration and exploitation throughout the evolution process. In this paper, the authors develop an Improved version of the Fuzzy-based Multiobjective Differential Evolution (IFMDE) that exploits performance metrics, specifically hypervolume, spacing, and maximum spread, to measure the state of the evolution progress. They apply the fuzzy inference rules, derived from domain knowledge, to these metrics in order to dynamically adjust the associated control parameters of a chosen mutation and crossover strategy used in this algorithm. One mutation parameter controls the degree of greedy or exploitation, while another regulates the degree of diversity or exploration of the reproduction phase. On the other hand, crossover rate controls the fraction of trial vector elements inherited from the mutant vectors. In doing so collectively, the authors can appropriately adjust the degree of exploration and exploitation through performance feedback. A 5 by 5 microstrip antenna array design problem is formulated as a three-objective optimization problem. The proposed IFMDE is applied to tackle this problem under real-world complications. Since the objective evaluations of a 5 by 5 microstrip antenna array are computationally very expensive, a radial basis function neural network is trained as a surrogate model for the fitness function approximations. The experimental results demonstrate the ability of IFMDE that it can find not only one, but a set of Pareto optimal solutions, specifically in terms of side lobe level and reflection coefficient. These multiple Pareto-optimal configurations can then be chosen from by a decision maker given dynamic operating environments, constraints and uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Abbass HA, 2002, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P831, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2002.1007033
[2]  
Auger A, 2009, FOGA'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH ACM SIGRVO CONFERENCE ON FOUNDATIONS OF GENETIC ALGORITHMS, P87
[3]   HypE: An Algorithm for Fast Hypervolume-Based Many-Objective Optimization [J].
Bader, Johannes ;
Zitzler, Eckart .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2011, 19 (01) :45-76
[4]  
Balanis C., 2016, MODERN ANTENNA HDB, V4th
[5]   Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: A comparative study on numerical benchmark problems [J].
Brest, Janez ;
Greiner, Saso ;
Boskovic, Borko ;
Mernik, Marjan ;
Zumer, Vijern .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2006, 10 (06) :646-657
[6]  
Broomhead D. S., 1988, Complex Systems, V2, P321
[7]   Optimization of the difference patterns for monopulse antennas by a hybrid real/integer-coded differential evolution method [J].
Caorsi, S ;
Massa, A ;
Pastorino, M ;
Randazzo, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2005, 53 (01) :372-376
[8]   Solving multiobjective optimization problems using an artificial immune system [J].
Coello C.A.C. ;
Cortés N.C. .
Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 2005, 6 (2) :163-190
[9]  
Deb A., 2011, INT J INFORM SYSTEMS, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/AEMC.2011.6256796
[10]  
Deb K, 2002, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P825, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2002.1007032