Lung cancer screening trials: Review of literature

被引:0
|
作者
Tsiouprou, Ioanna [1 ]
Spyratos, Dionisios [1 ]
Kontakiotis, Theodoros [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Pulm Dept, G Papanikolaou Hosp Exohi, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
Lung cancer; Screening; LDCT; Mortality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Lung cancer is considered one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality globally. Survival depends mainly on clinical stage of the disease, histological type of lung cancer and patient's performance status. Implementation of a screening program among high-risk subjects might increase overall survival by increasing detection of lung cancers in early stages. In general an ideal screening program should be highly sensitive and specific, based on simple and safe examinations, cost effective and easily implemented. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is currently the only proposed screening method for lung cancer. Based on the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which was conducted in the USA and proved a 20% reduction in lung cancer specific related mortality, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force proposed official guidelines since 2014. In Europe there are no lung cancer screening recommendations/guidelines as the final results of the NELSON trial are still pending. The aim of this paper is to review the most important published trials on lung cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 166
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lung Cancer Screening: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature with Detailed Data
    Acikgoz, Yusuf
    Sendur, Mehmet A. N.
    Ozdemir, Nuriye Y.
    Aksoy, Sercan
    Zengin, Nurullah
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2014, 24 (04): : 270 - 278
  • [2] Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature review
    Heleno, Bruno
    Thomsen, Maria F.
    Rodrigues, David S.
    Jorgensen, Karsten J.
    Brodersen, John
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347
  • [3] The evidence behind lung cancer screening: a narrative review of randomized clinical trials
    Mase Jr, Vincent J.
    Kumbasar, Ulas
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 5
  • [4] The evidence behind lung cancer screening: a narrative review of randomized clinical trials
    Mase Jr, Vincent J.
    Kumbasar, Ulas
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 5
  • [5] Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: A Review
    Haddad, Diane N.
    Sandler, Kim L.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    Aldrich, Melinda C.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2020, 17 (04) : 399 - 405
  • [6] Impact of CT screening in lung cancer: Scientific evidence and literature review
    Kennedy, Kathleen
    Hulbert, Alicia
    Pasquinelli, Mary
    Feldman, Lawrence E.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 49 (3-4) : 198 - 205
  • [7] A narrative review of lung cancer screening: risks of lung cancer screening
    Triphuridet, Natthaya
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    Wolf, Andrea
    CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 5
  • [8] The 50-Year Journey of Lung Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review
    Parekh, Aneri
    Deokar, Kunal
    Verma, Mrinalini
    Singhal, Sanjay
    Bhatt, Madan Lal
    Katoch, C. D. S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [9] A narrative review of lung cancer screening: risks of lung cancer screening
    Triphuridet, Natthaya
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    Wolf, Andrea
    CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 5
  • [10] Screening for lung cancer - a review
    Kuzniar, TJ
    Masters, GA
    Ray, DW
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2004, 10 (02): : RA21 - RA30