Overview and recent trends of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in hepatology

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, Gaeun [1 ]
Baik, Soon Koo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Keimyung Univ, Coll Nursing, Dept Nursing, 1095 Dalgubelo Daero, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Wonju, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Wonju Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Wonju 220701, South Korea
关键词
Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Hepatology;
D O I
10.3350/cmh.2014.20.2.137
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
A systematic review (SR) is a research methodology that involves a comprehensive search for and analysis of relevant studies on a specific topic. A strict and objective research process is conducted that comprises a systematic and comprehensive literature search in accordance with predetermined inclusion/ exclusion criteria, and an assessment of the risk of bias of the selected literature. SRs require a multidisciplinary approach that necessitates cooperation with clinical experts, methodologists, other experts, and statisticians. A meta-analysis (MA) is a statistical method of quantitatively synthesizing data, where possible, from the primary literature selected for the SR. Review articles differ from SRs in that they lack a systematic methodology such as a literature search, selection of studies according to strict criteria, assessment of risk bias, and synthesis of the study results. The importance of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the decision-making for public policy has recently been increasing thanks to the realization that it should be based on scientific research data. SRs and MAs are essential for EBM strategy and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. This review addresses the current trends in SRs and MAs in the field of hepatology via a search of recently published articles in the Cochrane Library and Ovid-MEDLINE.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 150
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment for Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Field of Hepatology
    Kim, Gaeun
    Cho, Youn Zoo
    Baik, Soon Koo
    GUT AND LIVER, 2015, 9 (06) : 701 - 706
  • [2] A brief overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Sriganesh, Kamath
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Busse, Jason W.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 60 (09) : 689 - 694
  • [3] Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture for Stroke
    Zhang, Jun-huai
    Wang, Deren
    Liu, Ming
    NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 42 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [4] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Menzies, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2011, 15 (05) : 582 - 593
  • [5] Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination
    Bartosz Helfer
    Aaron Prosser
    Myrto T Samara
    John R Geddes
    Andrea Cipriani
    John M Davis
    Dimitris Mavridis
    Georgia Salanti
    Stefan Leucht
    BMC Medicine, 13
  • [6] Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination
    Helfer, Bartosz
    Prosser, Aaron
    Samara, Myrto T.
    Geddes, John R.
    Cipriani, Andrea
    Davis, John M.
    Mavridis, Dimitris
    Salanti, Georgia
    Leucht, Stefan
    BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
  • [7] Nigella sativaand health outcomes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Li, Zhongyu
    Wang, Yang
    Xu, Qing
    Ma, Jinxin
    Li, Xuan
    Yan, Jiaxing
    Tian, Yibing
    Wen, Yandong
    Chen, Ting
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [8] Understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Islam, R. M.
    CLIMACTERIC, 2020, 23 (04) : 323 - 324
  • [9] Evaluating systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Schlesselman, JJ
    Collins, JA
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 21 (01) : 95 - 105
  • [10] Understanding Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
    Koretz, Ronald L.
    Lipman, Timothy O.
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2017, 41 (03) : 316 - 323