Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research A 26-country Study

被引:456
作者
Harzing, Anne-Wil [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Management, Int Management, Parkville Campus, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Management, PhD Programme, Studies, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
acquiescent response style; cross-national survey research; extreme response styles; language; research methods;
D O I
10.1177/1470595806066332
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Studies of attitudes across countries generally rely on a comparison of aggregated mean scores to Likert-scale questions. This presupposes that when people complete a questionnaire, their answers are based on the substantive meaning of the items to which they respond. However, people's responses are also influenced by their response style. Hence, the studies we conduct might simply reflect differences in the way people respond to surveys, rather than picking up real differences in management phenomena across countries. Our 26-country study shows that there are major differences in response styles between countries that both confirm and extend earlier research. Country-level characteristics such as power distance, collectivism, uncertainty avoidance and extraversion all significantly influence response styles such as acquiescence and extreme response styles. Further, English-language questionnaires are shown to elicit a higher level of middle responses, while questionnaires in a respondent's native language result in more extreme response styles. Finally, English-language competence is positively related to extreme response styles and negatively related to middle response styles. We close by discussing implications for cross-national research.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 266
页数:24
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Toward a geography of personality traits - Patterns of profiles across 36 cultures [J].
Allik, J ;
McCrae, RR .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 35 (01) :13-28
[2]   THE MEASUREMENT OF VALUES IN SURVEYS - A COMPARISON OF RATINGS AND RANKINGS [J].
ALWIN, DF ;
KROSNICK, JA .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1985, 49 (04) :535-552
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EKONOMIKA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, CULTURE INTERPERSONA
[5]   YEA-SAYING, NAY-SAYING, AND GOING TO EXTREMES - BLACK-WHITE DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE STYLES [J].
BACHMAN, JG ;
OMALLEY, PM .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1984, 48 (02) :491-509
[6]   Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation [J].
Baumgartner, H ;
Steenkamp, JBEM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :143-156
[7]   RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF BILINGUAL MANAGERS TO ORGANIZATIONAL QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
BENNETT, M .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 30 (01) :29-36
[8]   DIFFERENCES IN QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES BETWEEN ENGLISH AND GERMAN NATIONALS [J].
BRENGELMANN, JC .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1959, 16 (05) :339-355
[9]   RESPONSE STYLE AND CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISONS OF RATING-SCALES AMONG EAST-ASIAN AND NORTH-AMERICAN STUDENTS [J].
CHEN, C ;
LEE, SY ;
STEVENSON, HW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (03) :170-175
[10]   EXTREME RESPONSE STYLE IN CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH - REMINDER [J].
CHUN, KT ;
CAMPBELL, JB ;
YOO, JH .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 5 (04) :465-480