Development and validation of a diabetes knowledge questionnaire

被引:40
作者
Eigenmann, C. A. [1 ]
Skinner, T. [2 ]
Colagiuri, R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Diabet Council, 26 Arundel St, Sydney, NSW 2037, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Rural Clin Sch, Mt Gambier, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Menzies Ctr Hlth Policy, Grad Cert Hlth Policy & Management, Hlth & Sustainabil Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
outcome; measure; knowledge; questionnaire; diabetes education;
D O I
10.1002/pdi.1586
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
An Australian National Consensus Position on Outcomes and Indicators for Diabetes Education identified knowledge and understanding as the outcomes most directly affected by diabetes education. A subsequent literature review failed to identify a validated, suitable questionnaire for measuring knowledge. Consequently, we aimed to develop a minimum diabetes knowledge questionnaire (DKQ) suitable for people with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Content validity was established through literature review, Delphi survey of 52 opinion leaders and a workshop of Australian Diabetes Educators (n >= 300). The resulting instrument was tested for internal consistency on 129 and for reliability on 57 people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The final questionnaire contains: 12 multiple choice questions common to type 1 and type 2 diabetes, e.g. normal blood glucose levels, complications, diet, exercise, self-monitoring of blood glucose, annual check-ups, support services, and sick-days; two questions for people on oral medication/insulin only; and one question (sick-days) for people with type 1 diabetes only. For the first 12 questions, the internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha=0.73); with the additional item for type 1 diabetes, the internal consistency was slightly better (alpha=0.79) as it was with the additional items for people on medication/insulin (alpha=0.76). No particular item seemed to adversely affect the overall consistency of the questionnaire. Comparing test-retest pilots, total scores showed good reliability with no evidence of change over time (t=1.73; df=56; p<0.85), and a correlation of 0.62. The DKQ is now ready to use for evaluating knowledge outcomes of diabetes education. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CAN J DIABETES, V29, P220
[3]   A national consensus on outcomes and indicators for diabetes patient education [J].
Colagiuri, R. ;
Eigenmann, C. A. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (04) :442-446
[4]  
Corabian P, 2001, IHTA A
[5]  
Duffield C, 1988, Aust J Adv Nurs, V6, P41
[6]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIABETES KNOWLEDGE (DKN) SCALES - FORMS DKNA, DKNB, AND DKNC [J].
DUNN, SM ;
BRYSON, JM ;
HOSKINS, PL ;
ALFORD, JB ;
HANDELSMAN, DJ ;
TURTLE, JR .
DIABETES CARE, 1984, 7 (01) :36-41
[7]  
Eigenmann C, 2007, OUTCOMES INDICATORS
[8]  
Eigenmann C, 2007, CONS WORKSH NAT CONS
[9]   Are current psychometric tools suitable for measuring outcomes of diabetes education? [J].
Eigenmann, C. A. ;
Colagiuri, R. ;
Skinner, T. C. ;
Trevena, L. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (04) :425-436
[10]   Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression [J].
Ellis, SE ;
Speroff, T ;
Dittus, RS ;
Brown, A ;
Pichert, JW ;
Elasy, TA .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 52 (01) :97-105