Income Risk Management in Agriculture using Financial Support

被引:6
作者
Novickyte, Lina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lithuanian Inst Agrarian Econ, V Kudirkos St 18-2, LT-03105 Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | 2018年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
agriculture; agricultural policy; financial support; income risk; risk perception; behaviour;
D O I
10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p191
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agriculture is often characterized by high variability of production outcomes, agricultural commodities prices are extremely fluctuating, and segmented agricultural markets will be influenced mainly by local supply and demand conditions, while more globally integrated markets will be significantly affected by international production dynamics. Unexpected changes in agriculture policy that affect producers' activities constitutes another important source of uncertainty to agricultural producers. Changes in regulations can have significant impact on the profitability of farming activities. Individual farms have different strategies and attitudes to manage the income risk. This article presents some theoretical insights on risks in agriculture, risk management strategies and the impact of financial support to manage risk. Government and other public stakeholders participate in risk management based on the economic benefits that farmers due to ineffective risk management and the inability of the market itself to neutralize the negative effects of the risk receive lower income. Then public stakeholders try to remedy market imperfections using various forms financial support or compensation mechanism. This strategy is often criticized, as it is impeding the functioning of free market and distorting the behaviour of farm managers in terms of risk tolerance. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to present the state-of-play in agriculture risk management and how agricultural producer's behaviour and risk tolerance affect their risk perception and the choice of different risk management strategies. The results of the review are useful in assessing the effectiveness of the current Common Agricultural Policy and considering the obtained results to draw up strategic guidelines for the future Common Agricultural Policy.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 202
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, GLOBAL TEMPERATURE R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, STATE PLAY RISK MANA, DOI [10.2861/305797, DOI 10.2861/305797]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COMM MARK
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, EU BUDG COMM AGR POL
[5]  
Anton Jesus., 2012, OECD FOOD AGR FISHER, DOI [10.1787/5k94d6fx5bd8-en, DOI 10.1787/5K94D6FX5BD8-EN]
[6]   Receptiveness to advice, cognitive ability, and technology adoption [J].
Barham, Bradford L. ;
Chavas, Jean-Paul ;
Fitz, Dylan ;
Schechter, Laura .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2018, 149 :239-268
[7]   Expected utility or prospect theory maximisers? Assessing farmers' risk behaviour from field-experiment data [J].
Bocqueho, Geraldine ;
Jacquet, Florence ;
Reynaud, Arnaud .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (01) :135-172
[8]   The resilience of family farms: Towards a relational approach [J].
Darnhofer, Ika ;
Lamine, Claire ;
Strauss, Agnes ;
Navarrete, Mireille .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2016, 44 :111-122
[9]  
EC, 2018, DEB COMM AGR POL EU
[10]   Independence and individualism: conflated values in farmer cooperation? [J].
Emery, Steven B. .
AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2015, 32 (01) :47-61