RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: HEILBRONN EXPERIENCE

被引:0
作者
Teber, Dogu [1 ]
Gozen, Ali Serdar [1 ]
Soyupek, Sedat [2 ]
Gurbuz, Cenk [3 ]
Rassveiler, Jens J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Egitim Hastanesi SLK Klin, Urol Klin, Heilbronn Almanya, Germany
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Tip Fak, Urol Anabilim Dali, Isparta, Turkey
[3] Goztepe Egitim & Arastirma Hastanesi 2, Urol Klin, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2007年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction; Pyeloplasty; Laparoscopy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: We aim to report our experience with the treatment of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) using an algorithm with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RLPP) and to assess the treatment efficacy and results of this technique. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of LPP operations in 138 adult patients (60 women, 78 men) at a single institute between 1995 and 2006 were performed. The diagnosis of UPJO was confirmed by renal ultrasound, intra venous urography (IVU), retrograde uretopyelography (RP) and diuretic renography. In cases of ureteral kinking, color duplex sonography with or without spiral computer tomography were added to verify the presence of crossing vessels. Flank pain was the predominant presenting complaint in 92% of the cases. 11.5% of the patients were presented with recurrent pyelonephritis in and 1.4% with hematuria. Patients with posterioriorly crossing vessels or a redundant renal pelvis were treated with dismembered LPP while cases with anteriorly crossing vessels underwent nondismembered LPP. In the earlier cases of our series easier procedures such as ureterolysis or Fenger plasty were chosen predominantly. A double J stent placement was performed preoperatively. All the procedures were performed via the retroperitoneal approach. A three port insertion is used with an additional port placed as needed. Success was defined as resolution of symptoms (improvement of flank pain), associated with stable or improved renal function, reduction of hydronephrosis on ultrasound or IVU. Results: Dismembered pyeloplasty was performed in 42 cases. Nondismembered pyeloplasty were performed by either YV plasty in 66 cases or Fenger plasty in 15 cases. The stenosis of UPJ was operated by only uretrolyses in 15 cases. The underlying patology for UPJO was exstrinsic, intrinsic and combined causes in 125, 7 and 6 cases respectively. The operating time was averaged 126 (range 37 to 368) minutes. All operations except one were completed laparoscopically without any intraoperative complications. Only one patient needed open conversion because a significant tension on anastomosis. Post operative complications were retroperitoneal hematoma in 5 cases, urinary leakage in 2 cases and ureteral stent obstruction in 1 case. The postoperative complication rate was calculated as 6.5 %. The mean hospital stay was 5 (range 3 to 10) days. The double J stents were removed postoperatively in four to six weeks following a RP to check there is no evidence of urinary leakage and control the UPJ. An IVU was performed 6 weeks after the stent removal. A diuretic renogram was performed at 3 months and annually therafter if needed. Long term follow up ranges from 6-141 (mean 65) months. Overall success rate was 94.2 %. The eight patients who developed recurrent symptoms and obstruction were accepted as failures and further treatment needed as laser endopyeolotomy in 4 cases, open pyeloplasty in 3 cases, nephrectomy in 1 case. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal LPP is safe and effective way to treat UPJO while providing a minimally invasive procedure resulting in less morbidity. We feel that, LPP is a valuable alternative of open pyeloplasty in adult patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 461
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty:: technique and 1 year follow-up
    Bentas, W
    Wolfram, M
    Bräutigam, R
    Probst, M
    Beecken, WD
    Jonas, D
    Binder, J
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 21 (03) : 133 - 138
  • [2] Danuser H, 1998, J UROLOGY, V159, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64011-4
  • [3] Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction
    Davenport, K
    Minervini, A
    Timoney, AG
    Keeley, FX
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (06) : 973 - 977
  • [4] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Eden, C
    Gianduzzo, T
    Chang, C
    Thiruchelvam, N
    Jones, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (06) : 2308 - 2311
  • [5] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases
    Eden, CG
    Cahill, D
    Allen, JD
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (06) : 526 - 531
  • [6] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for upj obstruction with crossing vessels: Contrast-enhanced color doppler findings and long-term outcome
    Frauscher, F
    Janetschek, G
    Klauser, A
    Peschel, R
    Halpern, EJ
    Pallwein, L
    Helweg, G
    Nedden, DZ
    Bartsch, G
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (04) : 500 - 505
  • [7] Gnanapragasam VJ, 2001, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V83, P347
  • [8] Crossing vessels - Endourologic implications
    Gupta, M
    Smith, AD
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 25 (02) : 289 - +
  • [9] Laparoscopic Fenger plasty
    Janetschek, G
    Peschel, R
    Bartsch, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (10) : 889 - 893
  • [10] Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Janetschek, G
    Peschel, R
    Altarac, S
    Bartsch, G
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (03) : 311 - 316