Efficacy and safety of olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in newly diagnosed patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

被引:2
作者
Ramesh, Revathi [1 ]
Sarala, N. [1 ]
Venkatarathnamma, P. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sri Devaraj Urs Acad Higher Educ & Res, Dept Pharmacol, Sri Devaraj Urs Med Coll, Kolar, Karnataka, India
[2] Sri Devaraj Urs Acad Higher Educ & Res, Dept Med, Sri Devaraj Urs Med Coll, Kolar, Karnataka, India
关键词
Hydrochlorothiazide; hypertension; olmesartan; telmisartan;
D O I
10.4103/jphi.JPHI_4_18
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Hypertension is one of the most prevalent noncommunicable diseases. The Joint National Commission VIII guidelines recommend angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as the first-line drug and addition ofhydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) increases their efficacy. Olmesartan medoxomil is recently introduced, whereas telmisartan is a relatively older ARB. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of olmesartan and HCTZ versus telmisartan and HCTZ in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were recruited and randomized to receive either olmesartan 20 mg+ HCTZ 12.5 mg (Group 0) or telmisartan 40 mg+ HCTZ 12.5 mg (Group T) orally once daily for 8 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were recorded at baseline and at 4 t' and 8th weeks, but blood sugar and lipid profile were estimated at baseline and 8 th week. Results: Forty-six Group 0 and 44 Group T patients completed the study. Majority of patients were in the fifth decade of life (72.3%), 56% were males, and 35% had type II diabetes mellitus and received oral antidiabetics. The mean BP was 148.6 + 5.9/89.2 + 5.9 and 147.9 + 5.2/88.1 + 4.2 mmHg at baseline and decreased significantly at week 8 (131.0 + 5.4/80.3 + 2.9 and 136.8 + 5.5/83.6 + 3.9 mmHg) in Group 0 and Group T respectively. Patients in Group 0 had significant reduction in systolic BP (SBP) (P = 0.0001) and diastolic BP (P = 0.04) than that in Group T. More than 10 mmHg decrease in SBP was observed in 86.9% versus 65.9% of patients in Group 0 and Group T, respectively, which was statistically significant (P = 0.01). Diabetic patients in both groups had a significant decrease in blood sugar by week 8, but intergroup comparison was insignificant. Change in heart rate and lipid profile was negligible. Common adverse effects were dizziness, abdominal pain, and pedal edema in both groups. Conclusion: Olmesartan + HCTZ was more effective than telmisartan + HCTZ in lowering BP.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 43
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   A comparative study on the effectiveness of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide and telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with hypertension [J].
Hamada, Toshihiro ;
Kuwabara, Masanari ;
Watanabe, Arisa ;
Mizuta, Einosuke ;
Ohtahara, Akira ;
Omodani, Hiroki ;
Watanabe, Masashi ;
Nakamura, Hiroki ;
Hirota, Yutaka ;
Miyazaki, Satoshi ;
Kato, Masahiko ;
Ogino, Kazuhide ;
Kosaka, Hiroki ;
Haruaki, Ninomiya ;
Taniguchi, Shin-ichi ;
Yamamoto, Kazuhiro ;
Kotake, Hiroshi ;
Hisatome, Ichiro .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2014, 36 (04) :251-257
[22]   Ambulatory blood pressure comparison of the anti-hypertensive efficacy of fixed combinations of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide and losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [J].
Neutel, JM ;
Smith, D .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (06) :620-631
[23]   Comparison of the combination of enalapril and a very low dose of hydrochlorothiazide with atenolol in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [J].
Os, I ;
Hotnes, T ;
Dollerup, J ;
Mogensen, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1997, 10 (08) :899-904
[24]   Economic evaluation of telmisartan, valsartan and losartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide for treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in Greece: a cost-utility analysis [J].
Kourlaba, Georgia ;
Fragoulakis, Vassilios ;
Theodoratou, Dorina ;
Maniadakis, Nikos .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2013, 4 (02) :81-88
[25]   Treatment of mild-to-moderate arterial hypertension with pinacidil alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide [J].
Degaute, JP ;
Leeman, M ;
Messin, R ;
Bruhwyler, J ;
Geczy, J .
CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1998, 59 (05) :269-274
[26]   Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide in older patients with predominantly systolic hypertension [J].
Neldam, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (05) :90A-91A
[27]   COMPARISON OF FOSINOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION [J].
FORSLUND, T ;
FRANZEN, P ;
BACKMAN, R .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 230 (06) :511-517
[28]   Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of telmisartan and enalapril, with the potential addition of frusemide, in moderate-renal failure patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [J].
Hannedouche, T ;
Chanard, J ;
Baumelou, B .
JOURNAL OF THE RENIN-ANGIOTENSIN-ALDOSTERONE SYSTEM, 2001, 2 (04) :246-254
[29]   Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg/Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg Combination Therapy versus Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg Monotherapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Hypertension [J].
Fogari, Roberto ;
Taddei, Stefano ;
Holm-Bentzen, Merete ;
Baszak, Jacek ;
Melani, Lorenzo ;
Schumacher, Kai .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2010, 30 (09) :581-597
[30]   Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of losartan alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in adult African Americans with mild to moderate hypertension [J].
Flack, JM ;
Saunders, E ;
Gradman, A ;
Kraus, WE ;
Lester, FM ;
Pratt, JH ;
Alderman, M ;
Green, S ;
Vargas, R ;
Espenshade, M ;
Ceesay, P ;
Alexander, J ;
Goldberg, A .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (08) :1193-1208