Efficacy and safety of olmesartan and hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in newly diagnosed patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension

被引:2
|
作者
Ramesh, Revathi [1 ]
Sarala, N. [1 ]
Venkatarathnamma, P. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sri Devaraj Urs Acad Higher Educ & Res, Dept Pharmacol, Sri Devaraj Urs Med Coll, Kolar, Karnataka, India
[2] Sri Devaraj Urs Acad Higher Educ & Res, Dept Med, Sri Devaraj Urs Med Coll, Kolar, Karnataka, India
关键词
Hydrochlorothiazide; hypertension; olmesartan; telmisartan;
D O I
10.4103/jphi.JPHI_4_18
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Hypertension is one of the most prevalent noncommunicable diseases. The Joint National Commission VIII guidelines recommend angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as the first-line drug and addition ofhydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) increases their efficacy. Olmesartan medoxomil is recently introduced, whereas telmisartan is a relatively older ARB. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of olmesartan and HCTZ versus telmisartan and HCTZ in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were recruited and randomized to receive either olmesartan 20 mg+ HCTZ 12.5 mg (Group 0) or telmisartan 40 mg+ HCTZ 12.5 mg (Group T) orally once daily for 8 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate were recorded at baseline and at 4 t' and 8th weeks, but blood sugar and lipid profile were estimated at baseline and 8 th week. Results: Forty-six Group 0 and 44 Group T patients completed the study. Majority of patients were in the fifth decade of life (72.3%), 56% were males, and 35% had type II diabetes mellitus and received oral antidiabetics. The mean BP was 148.6 + 5.9/89.2 + 5.9 and 147.9 + 5.2/88.1 + 4.2 mmHg at baseline and decreased significantly at week 8 (131.0 + 5.4/80.3 + 2.9 and 136.8 + 5.5/83.6 + 3.9 mmHg) in Group 0 and Group T respectively. Patients in Group 0 had significant reduction in systolic BP (SBP) (P = 0.0001) and diastolic BP (P = 0.04) than that in Group T. More than 10 mmHg decrease in SBP was observed in 86.9% versus 65.9% of patients in Group 0 and Group T, respectively, which was statistically significant (P = 0.01). Diabetic patients in both groups had a significant decrease in blood sugar by week 8, but intergroup comparison was insignificant. Change in heart rate and lipid profile was negligible. Common adverse effects were dizziness, abdominal pain, and pedal edema in both groups. Conclusion: Olmesartan + HCTZ was more effective than telmisartan + HCTZ in lowering BP.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 43
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Comparison with Losartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Managing Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension
    Joel M Neutel
    Thomas W Littlejohn
    Steven G Chrysant
    Ashish Singh
    Hypertension Research, 2005, 28 : 555 - 563
  • [2] Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide in comparison with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in managing patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Neutel, JM
    Littlejohn, TW
    Chrysant, SG
    Singh, A
    HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2005, 28 (07) : 555 - 563
  • [3] Combination treatment with telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension
    McGill, JB
    Reilly, PA
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 24 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [4] Efficacy, safety, and effects on hypertension-associated symptoms of losartan, alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, versus amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Tiebel, R
    Vahlbruch, A
    Stapff, M
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1998, 59 (06): : 325 - 340
  • [5] Matrix study of irbesartan with hydrochlorothiazide in mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Kochar, M
    Guthrie, R
    Triscari, J
    Kassler-Taub, K
    Reeves, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 12 (08) : 797 - 805
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF CILAZAPRIL VERSUS CILAZAPRIL PLUS HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    KELLAWAY, GSM
    ATKINSON
    BEVIN
    CHOY
    DELACEY
    DINE
    DOERR
    DYKES
    EAMES
    EDWARDS
    FORD
    GARE
    HAYCOCK
    HAYWOOD
    HENDY
    HUNTER
    LOAN
    LOWE
    MULES
    NEALIE
    PARKER
    POLLOCK
    RASALINGHAM
    REEKIE
    RICHMOND
    SANDIN
    STAUB
    SUCKLING
    SURYNT
    VICKERS
    WELLINGTON
    WELLS
    WONG
    YOUNG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 44 (04) : 377 - 379
  • [7] Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial
    McGill, JB
    Reilly, PA
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 23 (06) : 833 - 850
  • [8] The efficacy of telmisartan compared with perindopril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Nalbantgil, I
    Nalbantgil, S
    Özerkan, F
    Yilmaz, H
    Gürgün, C
    Zoghi, M
    Aytimur, M
    Önder, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 58 : 50 - 54
  • [9] Combination antihypertensive therapy with valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension
    Sun, Ning-L.
    Zhu, Jun-R.
    Zhao, Yanxing
    Tu, Ying-M.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (10) : 2863 - 2871
  • [10] Tolerability and efficacy of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide compared with amiloride and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension
    Saini, R
    Romanini, M
    Mos, L
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1998, 15 (02) : 91 - 99