INDIVIDUAL VERSUS ORGANIZATIONAL PREDICTORS OF JOB-SATISFACTION AND TURNOVER AMONG PROFESSIONALS

被引:27
作者
BARTOL, KM
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0001-8791(79)90018-6
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In a constructive replication and extension of previous research, the relative importance of individual (personality and professional attitudes) versus organizational (professional reward system and tenure) variables in predicting job satisfaction and turnover was investigated for the case of professionals. Support among a sample of computer specialists was found for the notion that, among professionals, individual variables are more important than organizational factors in predicting satisfaction with the work itself; but individual variables often played a major role in satisfaction with contextual aspects of the job as well. Organizational factors were found to be significantly predictive of satisfaction with all aspects of the job, but were the only significant predictors of turnover. Thus the importance of organizational factors over individual factors for professionals was supported more clearly for the behavioral outcome, turnover, than for attitudinal outcomes. © 1979.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 67
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Cohen J., 1983, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, V2
[2]  
DICAPRIO NS, 1974, PERSONALITY THEORY
[3]   RELATIONSHIPS OF SELECTED SIZE AND STRUCTURE INDICATORS IN ECONOMIC ORGANIZATIONS [J].
EVERS, FT ;
BOHLEN, JM ;
WARREN, RD .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1976, 21 (02) :326-342
[4]  
FARRIS GF, 1971, PERS PSYCHOL, V24, P311
[5]  
Filley A. C., 1969, MANAGERIAL PROCESS O
[6]  
FITZENZ J, 1978, DATAMATION, V24, P125
[7]   DIMENSIONALITY OF COSMOPOLITAN-LOCAL CONSTRUCT [J].
FLANGO, VE ;
BRUMBAUG.RB .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1974, 19 (02) :198-210
[8]   PERFORMANCE AND ORIENTATION STRUCTURES OF RESEARCH SCIENTISTS [J].
FRIEDLANDER, F .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1971, 6 (02) :169-183
[9]  
Galbraith J., 1977, DESIGNING COMPLEX OR
[10]   THE LOCAL-COSMOPOLITAN SCIENTIST [J].
GLASER, BG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1963, 69 (03) :249-259