Planning or e-Planning? Implications for Theory, Education and Practice

被引:3
|
作者
Alexander, Ernest R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Milwaukee, Urban Planning, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA
[2] APD, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
e-Planning; Institutionalization; Planner's Role; Planning Education; Planning Practice; Planning Theory;
D O I
10.4018/ijepr.2014010101
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Planning theory is hardly relevant for E-Planning, because generic "planning" does not exist for practical purposes, except as distinct planning practices. E-Planning is such a practice, with implications for E-Planning theory, education and practice. Defining planning as "what planners do" makes planning a socially recognized practice; for such practices "planning" always has a qualifyer: urban-, environmental-or strategic planning. Meaningful discussion of planning demands contingent referents not abstract generalizations. Diverse planning practices are identifyable on several dimensions: sector, level or domain, and country. With various actors and blends of usable knowledge, planning practices contribute expertise to the co-construction of knowledge. The case for E-Planning follows the prototype of spatial planning, including tools: knowledge that E-planners contribute; practice: the E-Planner's role and social purpose; and context: E-planners' workplaces and their institutional environment. Evidence of institutionalization (including the IJEPR) confirms that E-Planning is a real planning practice, with E-Planning theory in development and awaiting integration.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Planning education: exchanging approaches to teaching practice-based skills
    Ritchie, Heather
    Sheppard, Adam
    Croft, Nick
    Peel, Deborah
    INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 54 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [32] Insurgent Planning: A New Planning Theory for Developing Countries
    Fakioglu, Pelin Albayrak
    PLANLAMA-PLANNING, 2022, 32 (01): : 24 - 37
  • [33] Unsettling planning theory
    Barry, Janice
    Horst, Megan
    Inch, Andy
    Legacy, Crystal
    Rishi, Susmita
    Rivero, Juan J.
    Taufen, Anne
    Zanotto, Juliana M.
    Zitcer, Andrew
    PLANNING THEORY, 2018, 17 (03) : 418 - 438
  • [34] Planning theory and the city
    Fainstein, SS
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2005, 25 (02) : 121 - 130
  • [35] INSTITUTIONAL PLANNING THEORY AS A GENERAL PLANNING THEORY: STATE OF THE ART AND FURTHER DEVELOPMENT
    Tambovtsev, Vitaliy L.
    Rozhdestvenskaya, Irina A.
    TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2018, 16 (02): : 27 - 45
  • [36] Bottom-up planning and the future of planning education in India
    Chettiparamb, Angelique
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2006, 26 (02) : 185 - 194
  • [37] Tourism planning and planning theory: Historical roots and contemporary alignment
    Rahmafitria, Fitri
    Pearce, Philip L.
    Oktadiana, Hera
    Putro, Heru P. H.
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 35
  • [38] Collaborative Planning by Metropolitan Planning Organizations: A Test of Causal Theory
    Deyle, Robert E.
    Wiedenman, Ryan E.
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (03) : 257 - 275
  • [39] Knowledge in communicative planning practice: a different perspective for planning support systems
    Pelzer, Peter
    Geertman, Stan
    van der Heijden, Rob
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2015, 42 (04): : 638 - 651
  • [40] Implications of Korean traditional epistemology in planning theory: Focusing on the pragmatic philosophy of Silhak
    EunHa, Jun
    KyuYoung, Cho
    SeongWoo, Lee
    KOREA JOURNAL, 2006, 46 (04) : 168 - 191