CHARACTERIZATION OF DENATURED PROTEIN INDUCERS OF THE HEAT-SHOCK (STRESS) RESPONSE IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS OOCYTES

被引:1
|
作者
MIFFLIN, LC
COHEN, RE
机构
[1] UNIV IOWA,DEPT BIOCHEM,IOWA CITY,IA 52242
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,DEPT CHEM & BIOCHEM,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[3] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,INST MOLEC BIOL,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In addition to thermal stress, a large variety of physical and chemical treatments are known to induce heat shock gene expression. Denatured protein, thought to result from the stress condition, has been postulated to act as the common signal. Accordingly, of three pairs of native and denatured proteins injected into Xenopus laevis oocytes, only the denatured derivatives induced expression of a reporter gene from a heat shock promoter (Ananthan, J., Goldberg, A. L., and Voellmy, R. (1986) Science 232, 522-525). These observations are extended here. Protein denaturation per se is shown to be insufficient for heat shock induction; although reduced and carboxymethylated bovine serum albumin (rcm-BSA) and alpha-crystallin elicited a stress response, many other denatured proteins had no effect. Methylation of protein lysines, done to prevent ubiquitination, suppressed heat shock induction by rcm-BSA, but enhanced induction by alpha-crystallin. Thus, the potential for a protein to be ubiquitinated is independent of its ability to induce the stress response. Instead, aggregation distinguished the proteins that were effective stress inducers, and the formation of large aggregates correlated with the magnitude of the response. This correlation may derive in part from decreased in vivo degradation rates of the inducer proteins. An apparent requirement for stress response induction that the inducer proteins be injected directly into the oocyte nucleus may relate to this issue of in vivo stability. The dependence of the stress response on the amount of injected protein is nonlinear and of a form consistent with the titration of a factor that otherwise suppresses heat shock gene expression.
引用
收藏
页码:15710 / 15717
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HSC70 MODERATES THE HEAT-SHOCK (STRESS) RESPONSE IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS OOCYTES AND BINDS TO DENATURED PROTEIN INDUCERS
    MIFFLIN, LC
    COHEN, RE
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 269 (22) : 15718 - 15723
  • [2] THE DEVELOPMENTAL EXPRESSION OF THE HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS
    DAVIS, RE
    KING, ML
    DEVELOPMENT, 1989, 105 (02): : 213 - 222
  • [3] HEAT-SHOCK IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS FOLLICLES
    ROJAS, CV
    ALLENDE, JE
    ARCHIVOS DE BIOLOGIA Y MEDICINA EXPERIMENTALES, 1981, 14 (03): : 292 - 292
  • [4] EFFECT OF DIADENOSINE TETRAPHOSPHATE MICROINJECTION ON HEAT-SHOCK PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS IN XENOPUS-LAEVIS OOCYTES
    GUEDON, G
    SOVIA, D
    EBEL, JP
    BEFORT, N
    REMY, P
    EMBO JOURNAL, 1985, 4 (13B): : 3743 - 3749
  • [5] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE OF XENOPUS-LAEVIS EMBRYOS
    NICKELLS, RW
    BROWDER, LW
    WANG, TI
    BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY-BIOCHIMIE ET BIOLOGIE CELLULAIRE, 1989, 67 (10): : 687 - 695
  • [6] FACTORS AFFECTING THE HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE IN FEMALE GAMETES OF XENOPUS-LAEVIS
    POLLOCK, M
    BROWDER, LW
    JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1986, 103 (05): : A479 - A479
  • [7] DECAY OF THE OOCYTE-TYPE HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE OF XENOPUS-LAEVIS
    BROWDER, LW
    POLLOCK, M
    HEIKKILA, JJ
    WILKES, J
    WANG, T
    KRONE, P
    OVSENEK, N
    KLOC, M
    DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1987, 124 (01) : 191 - 199
  • [8] THE HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE IN XENOPUS OOCYTES
    NETH, LM
    WASSERMAN, WJ
    JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1986, 103 (05): : A187 - A187
  • [9] ACQUISITION OF THE HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE AND THERMOTOLERANCE DURING EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF XENOPUS-LAEVIS
    HEIKKILA, JJ
    KLOC, M
    BURY, J
    SCHULTZ, GA
    BROWDER, LW
    DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1985, 107 (02) : 483 - 489
  • [10] THE EFFECTS OF HEAT-SHOCK ON THE MORPHOLOGY AND PROTEIN-SYNTHESIS OF THE EPIDERMIS OF XENOPUS-LAEVIS LARVAE
    NICKELLS, RW
    CAVEY, MJ
    BROWDER, LW
    JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1988, 106 (03): : 905 - 914