Discharge interventions for older patients leaving hospital: protocol for a systematic meta-review

被引:11
作者
Francischetto, Elaine O'Connell [1 ]
Damery, Sarah [1 ]
Davies, Sarah [2 ]
Combes, Gill [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Hlth & Populat Sci, NIHR CLAHRC West Midlands Theme 4 Chron Dis, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] UCL, Inst Child Hlth, Behav Brain Sci Unit, 30 Guilford St, London WC1N 1EH, England
关键词
Hospital discharge; Older people; Meta-review; Review of reviews;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-016-0222-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is an increased need for additional care and support services for the elderly population. It is important to identify what support older people need once they are discharged from hospital and to ensure continuity of care. There is a large evidence base focusing on enhanced discharge services and their impact on patients. The services show some potential benefits, but there are inconsistent findings across reviews. Furthermore, it is unclear what elements of enhanced discharge interventions could be most beneficial to older people. This meta-review aims to identify existing systematic reviews of discharge interventions for older people, identify potentially effective elements of enhanced discharge services for this patient group and identify areas where further work may still be needed. Methods/design: The search will aim to identify English language systematic reviews that have assessed the effectiveness of discharge interventions for older people. The following databases will be searched: Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, HMIC, Social Policy and Practice, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, ASSIA, Social Science Citation Index and the Grey Literature Report. The search strategy will comprise the keywords 'systematic reviews', 'older people' and 'discharge'. Discharge interventions must aim to support older patients before, during and/or after discharge from hospital. Outcomes of interest will include mortality, readmissions, length of hospital stay, patient health status, patient and carer satisfaction and staff views. Abstract, title and full text screening will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data extracted from reviews will include review characteristics, patient population, review quality score, outcome measures and review findings, and a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Discussion: This review will identify existing reviews of discharge interventions and appraise how these interventions can impact outcomes in older people such as readmissions, health status, length of hospital stay and mortality. The review could inform practice and will help identify where further research is needed. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42015025737.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Interventions aimed at reducing problems in adult patients discharged from hospital to home: a systematic meta-review [J].
Mistiaen, Patriek ;
Francke, Anneke L. ;
Poot, Else .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (1)
[22]   Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement [J].
Moher, David ;
Shamseer, Larissa ;
Clarke, Mike ;
Ghersi, Davina ;
Liberati, Alessandro ;
Petticrew, Mark ;
Shekelle, Paul ;
Stewart, Lesley A. .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE NUTRICION HUMANA Y DIETETICA, 2016, 20 (02) :148-160
[23]  
NHS Benchmarking, 2013, NAT AUD INT CAR REP
[24]  
NHS IMAS, 2012, 3 NHS IMAS
[25]  
Office for National Statistics, 2012, POP AG UK ITS CONST
[26]  
Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, 2009, LEVELS EVIDENCE
[27]  
Parker S G, 2002, Health Technol Assess, V6, P1
[28]   Methodological approaches in conducting overviews: current state in HTA agencies [J].
Pieper, Dawid ;
Antoine, Sunya-Lee ;
Morfeld, Jana-Carina ;
Mathes, Tim ;
Eikermann, Michaela .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2014, 5 (03) :187-199
[29]  
Robinson KA, 2013, AHRQ PUBLICATION, V13-EHC019-EF
[30]   Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers [J].
Seo, Hyun-Ju ;
Kim, Kyeong Uoon .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12